After a slow start to the year, the box office has officially caught fire the last two months. April managed to be a good primer for the summer movie season, which then led May to kick off the summer with a bang. A record breaking Memorial Day weekend led the way, with both “Lilo & Stitch” and “Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning” doing very well. We went from one of the worst Memorial Day weekends in 2024 to one of the best in 2025. Top that off with “Thunderbolts*” doing decent Marvel numbers to start the month off – albeit not quite as much as they maybe wanted, along with another $123 million in May for April’s breakout hit “Sinners,” as well as a $100 million outing for “Final Destination: Bloodlines” as that became the highest grossing movie of that franchise by quite the margin. “Karate Kid: Legends” missed the memo that we’re supposed to all be doing well, but even with that failure, the month as a whole nearly managed to hit $1 billion, finishing at $967.5 million domestically. For comparison, last May only earned $550.4 million, so this was a huge improvement.
Shall the momentum then carry on into June? Well, it’s a distinct possibility. It’s interesting, though, comparing 2024 to 2025. In 2024, as mentioned, we started the summer off very slow, then had a breakout June that hit $965.9 million before July went higher and crossed the $1 billion mark. I don’t want to predict that things will be flip-flopped here with May and June before July heads to the stratosphere with “Jurassic World: Rebirth,” “Superman,” and “The Fantastic Four: First Steps.” But I’m currently seeing just one movie that looks like a guaranteed hit in June, with a handful of others that have a lot of questions marks surrounding them. Maybe all the question marks wind up surprising and becoming breakout hits and lead to another great month, but I’m not so sure, so let’s dive into specifics here so that you know what I’m talking about here.
As always, release date information for this post is courtesy of the-numbers.com and boxofficepro.com. The movies listed are the ones currently scheduled for a wide release in the United States and Canada and are always subject to change.
June 6 – 8
![]() |
Lionsgate’s "From the World of John Wick: Ballerina" |
We start June off with one major release and a handful of smaller ones. With that one major one, it’s Lionsgate and they’re going to make it absolutely clear what universe this movie is from with the title From the World of John Wick: Ballerina. Director Chad Stahelski spent the majority of the last decade doing nothing but John Wick movies and came up with a four-movie saga that got increasingly more popular as it went on, to the degree of “John Wick: Chapter 4” opening to $73.8 million domestically and finishing with $187.3 million domestically and $447.3 million worldwide. If you watched the movie, you’ll note that clearly Stahelski meant for that to be the final movie in his saga, but Lionsgate, thinking with their bank account, was clearly not ready for the franchise to be over. So while they continue to try to get Stahelski and star Keanu Reeves to return for an official fifth movie, it’s off into the spin-off realm we go! Taking place at around the events of the third film, hence Reeves making a cameo appearance that’s probably a much bigger part of the advertising than it should be, this movie follows a character named Eve, played by Ana de Armas, who is a trained assassin seeking revenge after her father’s death. The movie is the first movie in the franchise not directed by Stahelski as it’s Len Wiseman, director of the Underworld movies and 2012’s “Total Recall” remake. That might have John Wick fans slightly nervous, but one hopes that Wiseman took enough notes from Stahelski to make this at least a satisfactory entry in the universe, which based on early reaction seems to be the case so far.
In regards to box office, the challenge here will be to see if “Ballerina” can dethrone “Lilo & Stitch,” which after opening to $146 million over the 3-day Memorial Day weekend, and $182.6 million over the 4-day weekend, officially fell 58 percent in weekend 2 to make $61.8 million. One might expect it to hold slightly better in weekend 3. As such, another 50 percent drop would put it in the $30 million range. If it holds slightly better, than somewhere between $30-40 million would be where “Lilo & Stitch” would be expected to hit. And that’s the exact range that Box Office Pro has for “Ballerina” in their current weekend forecast, so this could be a competitive weekend if that holds true. Spin-offs rarely hit the heights of the original series, so of course “Ballerina” isn’t expected to come anywhere near $73.8 million opening of “John Wick: Chapter 4” or even the $56.8 million opening of “John Wick: Chapter 3.” But if it does hit in the $30 million range, that would put it in the realm of “John Wick: Chapter 2,” which opened to $30.4 million.
As mentioned, “Ballerina” is the only major release of the weekend, but we do have a couple of medium sized releases coming through. The first one of that bunch is actually the nationwide expansion of Wes Anderson’s latest movie The Phoenician Scheme. This opened in 6 theaters on the final weekend of May, taking in $560,499, for an impressive per theater average of $93,417. Wes Anderson has always been a much bigger hit with the platform releases rather than being a huge mainstream draw. In fact, a lot of his movies have had a much slower roll-out with his niche appeal, but “The Phoenician Scheme” goes straight from 6 theaters to 1,678 theaters, which nearly identically matches the strategy of 2023’s “Asteroid City.” That movie opened to a slightly higher $853,382 in 6 theaters, then expanded to $1,675 theaters in its second weekend and made just over $9 million. With “The Phoenician Scheme” opening slightly smaller, maybe that sets it up to also make slightly less with $6-8 million or so, but we shall quickly see. Those who have seen the movie describe it very much as a Wes Anderson film and if you’ve seen any of his previous films, you’ll know what that means. His type of movies are basically their own genre and he doesn’t seem to have much of a desire to skew from that. They’re also always an acting party, with many actors perfectly content to show up in just a scene or two. Benecio del Toro is the top billed cast member for this movie, but below him on the poster is Mia Threapleton, Michael Cera, Riz Ahmed, Tom Hanks, Bryan Cranston, Mathieu Amalric, Richard Ayoade, Jeffrey Wright, Scarlett Johansson, Benedict Cumberbatch, Rupert Friend, and Hope Davis. And that’s not all the cast. Just the ones who managed to get their name on the poster.
Clocking in just under “The Phoenician Scheme” in regards to theater count is the horror film Dangerous Animals, which opens in 1,636 theaters. This is a movie whose theatrical distribution is being handled by IFC Films before it eventually heads over the streaming service Shudder, which is a release strategy taken by a variety of horror films from last year and this year, including “Stopmotion,” “Late Night with the Devil,” “In a Violent Nature,” “Oddity,” “Azrael,” and “The Rule of Jenny Pen.” Of that group, the two movies that match the theater count that “Dangerous Animals” is getting are “Late Night with the Devil” and “In a Violent Nature,” which opened to $2.8 million and $2.1 million, respectively. The buzz for “Dangerous Animals” has felt slightly muted, but reviews have been solid so far at 84 percent on Rotten Tomatoes. The movie stars Jai Courtney as a shark-obsessed serial killer, while Hassie Harrison plays a girl named Zephyr who gets kidnapped and wakes up on his boat and has to figure out how to escape before she gets fed to the sharks.
The last movie I’ll mention here for this weekend is Dan Da Dan: Evil Eye. I say movie here, but this is a collection of episodes from the anime series “Dan Da Dan” (I’ve also seen it stylized as “Dandadan”), which began airing last year and has a second season coming soon that will be released by either Crunchyroll, Netflix, or Hulu, depending on where in the world you live. Last year the first three episodes of season 1 were released theatrically as “Dan Da Dan: First Encounter,” while “Dan Da Dan: Evil Eye” this weekend is the first three episodes of season 2. In North America, it’s Hulu that’s releasing the series, while GKIDS is handling the theatrical event. An official theater count hasn’t been reported as of me typing this, but “First Encounter” this past September was released in 610 theaters domestically and earned $925,506, so I’d naturally expect something similar here.
June 13 – 15
![]() |
Universal’s "How to Train Your Dragon" |
In the intro of this post, I mentioned that it feels like there is one movie this month that feels like a guaranteed hit. That comes this weekend with Universal’s live-action remake of How to Train Your Dragon. I’m not really sure an introduction to this needs to be made, but “How to Train Your Dragon” was a 2010 animated film by DreamWorks Animation loosely based on the 2003 novel that is the first in a series that is currently 12 books deep. So there’s no shortage of source material here. DreamWorks’ movies capped off as a trilogy, with the second and third movies being released in 2014 and 2019, respectively. There were also three different TV shows that started on Cartoon Network in 2012, then transitioned to Netflix, Peackock, and Hulu. So this is definitely a franchise that remains quite popular and has many directions of where to go if they continue to do live action movies. Is it too soon to do a live action remake of a movie that came out in 2010? I suppose the answer to that question is up for debate, but just last month audiences said yes in a big way to “Lilo & Stitch,” which was a 2002 release. Disney is going for the 2010s next year with a live-action remake of “Moana,” so it looks like both the 2000s and 2010s are both now on the docket when it comes to these live-action remakes. “How to Train Your Dragon” this month will be a critical step in studios confirming from audiences that this is the direction they want studios to go. Don’t want it? Answer is simple. Don’t go. But the trailer reaction so far has been very strong and Box Office Pro is projecting this to open in the realm of $80-100 million, so the indication here is that audiences are wanting these remakes, despite what you might gather from people online. And if this does indeed work, DreamWorks might get all sorts of ideas of what to do next, beginning with a sequel to this one, already scheduled for June 2027.
Like the first weekend of June, “How to Train Your Dragon” is the lone major wide release, but we also have a trilogy of movies opening below it. And with two of them, you might think that we’ve entered awards season when you look at the titles. On that note, we’ll start with the much buzzed about release of The Life of Chuck. This movie debuted last year at the Toronto International Film Festival and wound up winning the People’s Choice Award at the festival. Every year since 2012, the winner of this award has gone onto being nominated for best picture at the Oscars, with a few best picture winners being in that club. So it was a big deal that “The Life of Chuck” beat out “Anora,” which did win best picture, and “Emelia Pérez,” which was nominated for 13 Oscars, those two movies being the two runners up for the People’s Choice Award at TIFF. It also made it a bit of a surprise that NEON chose to NOT release the movie during awards season last year, but instead put it out in the summer of this year. But current buzz, based on continued strong reaction to the movie, suggests that this is likely to be a film that has strong longevity throughout the year and winds up on the awards season ballot for this upcoming Oscars. The movie is directed by Mike Flanagan and is based on a Stephen King novella. Based on those two names you might think that this was a horror film. But it is not. This is described as a life-affirming, genre-bending drama telling three chapters in the life of an ordinary man named Chuck Krantz, the adult version of whom is played by Tom Hiddleston, with Chiwetel Ejiofor, Karen Gillan, and Mark Hamill getting the main co-star credit on the movie’s poster.
The other movie that makes it feel like we’re heading into awards season is the movie Materialists, which is the latest movie from director Celine Song. Now I mention this in awards context, not necessarily because of any buzz the movie itself is getting, but because Celine Song’s first movie was the drama “Past Lives,” which did get nominated for both best picture and best original screenplay. “Materialists” is her second directorial feature, so there’s been a certain level of buzz about what she’s doing next. And that next movie here looks like its an homage to the early 2000s romantic comedy, as Dakota Johnston plays a matchmaker currently struggling with her own romantic life, torn between an old ex played by Chris Evans and a new lover she met played by Pedro Pascal. One might wonder, given the success of “Past Lives,” as to why this isn’t coming out later in the year. But “Past Lives” wound up being a summer release as well. And awards or not, perhaps Celine Song is perfectly happy to use her success with her previous movie to simply provide a good summer rom-com for audiences. While its not necessarily projected to be a huge hit, this nevertheless has the pieces on paper to be a sleeper hit, or at least be a movie that remains part of the general conversation longer than just its initial theatrical run.
With the final release of the weekend, to heck with awards or giant summer blockbusters, we’re going Samuel L. Jackson in a Western with the movie The Unholy Trinity. We’ve got buried secrets in an 1870s Montana town that leads a young man to return to claim his legacy, while the Sheriff is determined to maintain order and a mysterious stranger is bent on destroying it. Get out your guns, horses, and appetite for adventure with Pierce Brosnan as the Sheriff, Samuel L. Jackson as the chaotic mystery man, and the somewhat newcomer Brandon Lessard playing the young man caught in between the two. This comes from distributor Roadside Attractions, who are known for their smaller and medium sized releases, so this won’t be a huge release. But hey, if you hate the trend of remakes and don’t want to give DreamWorks your money, this is one of three original movies hitting your local theater that you can see instead. Can’t say Hollywood is out of ideas when you don’t put enough effort into seeking out their original ideas that they release.
June 20 – 22
![]() |
Pixar's "Elio" |
Last June it was Pixar that really blew up the box office with their massive hit, “Inside Out 2.” A year later at nearly the same spot in the calendar, they are back with their latest original flick Elio. This is a movie about an Earth kid named Elio Solis who has a dream of being abducted by aliens. One day his wish comes true and he’s beamed up to the “Communiverse,” and interplanetary organization with representatives from many galaxies and they mistakenly think Elio is Earth’s leader, which sends him on quite the space adventure where he has to figure out who he is and where he’s truly meant to be. Pixar has actually been advertising this one for two years now. The initial teaser came out in June 2023, ahead of its initial scheduled release date of March 2024, but that was pushed back to this month due to the SAG-AFTRA strike in 2023. Despite having the trailer out for a long time, though, this appears to be a Pixar movie that’s having trouble gaining traction, not helped by the fact that it has “How to Train Your Dragon” looming right before it the weekend before. In all the history of Pixar, there’s only been six of the 25 theatrically released movies (“Soul,” “Luca,” and “Turning Red” went straight to Disney+) that opened below $50 million. When you adjust for ticket price inflation, that number goes from six movies to two movies: “Onward” and “Elemental.” And even then, “Onward” was hurt severely by being released in the early stages of COVID and only got two weeks in theaters before theaters shut down. An opening in the $60-80 million range used to be common for a Pixar original as Pixar was a strong enough brand on its own to get people excited to see whatever they put out, but that seems to be a thing of the past for Pixar.
There’s probably a variety of reasons for that. The biggest being that we’re simply in a phase where audiences are less interested in seeing original films and are more likely to show up for the sequels and remakes. But also, the fact that Disney sent those three Pixar originals straight to Disney+ during COVID got people out of the habit of seeing Pixar in theaters. Disney has been trying to make up for that and get people to go back to theaters for all of their movies really, but for the case of Pixar, it hasn’t exactly worked. “Elemental” ended up holding well after its very disappointing $29.6 million opening. And of course “Inside Out 2” went through the stratosphere, but again that was a sequel to a very popular film as opposed to an old-fashioned Pixar original. Pixar could really use a win to maintain upward momentum, but tracking from Box Office Pro has it pegged in the $35-45 million range. And given the lack of buzz on this, that seems to be a range that makes sense. And if that range is correct, that might only be good enough for No. 2 on the weekend, behind the second weekend of “How to Train Your Dragon.” This might be a movie that will have to rely more on good reviews and word of mouth, much like “Elemental” did. But nevertheless, for those who are tired of sequels and remakes, here’s your opportunity to support an original animated film. If “Elio” can’t gain any traction, then you’ll know why moving forward there will be more movies like “Toy Story 5,” “Coco 2,” and “Incredibles 3” (three movies currently in production) rather than more originals like “Elio.”
Competing with “Elio” this weekend will be another horror franchise revival, with the movie 28 Years Later. This will be the third movie in this series, with “28 Days Later” coming out in 2003, followed by “28 Weeks Later” in 2007. It hasn’t quite been 28 years since the second movie in real life, but it has been 18 years, which is a significant gap between sequels. When it comes to horror franchise revivals, the most recent example comes from just last month with “Final Destination: Bloodlines” not only successfully bringing the franchise back, but also becoming the highest grossing entry in the franchise, even when you do adjust for ticket price inflation. And that had a similar gap as “Final Destination 5” was released in 2011. The question here is, has the “28 Days Later” franchise gained enough popularity over the years for horror audiences to be excited for this new release? Fans of the movies have reason to be excited as Danny Boyle, director of the first movie, has returned to write and direct this new one. The movie also returns Alex Garland as a writer. Not only did Garland write the original, but he’s gained plenty of popularity since by directing movies like “Ex Machina,” “Annihilation” and last year’s “Civil War.” So on paper this seems poised for success. And to be the highest opening in the franchise is actually a very low bar. The original only opened to $10.1 million, while the sequel opened a bit lower to $9.8 million. Adjust for ticket price inflation and those adjust to $18.9 million and $16.1 million. So a $16-18 million range seems like a reasonable hurdle to clear, providing adult counter-programming for the two big family films at the top of the box office.
Two family films at the top of the box office will be supplemented by two adult films opening below them. Those are the aforementioned horror film “28 Years Later” and the final movie of this weekend, Bride Hard. For those looking for alternate entertainment, but who don’t like horror, “Bride Hard” is an action comedy where Rebel Wilson plays a secret agent attended her best friend’s wedding. When the wedding gets overtaken by a mercenary group, Rebel Wilson reveals her secret identity to her friends and fights like mad to stop the mercenary group and save her friend’s wedding. In times of old, comedies like this had the potential to become huge summer hits. My initial thought went to movies like “Spy!” from 2015 or “Heat” from 2013, two Melissa McCarthy comedies that opened to $29.1 million and $39.1 million, respectively, both holding well to gross over $100 million domestically. In our current post-COVID age, though, comedy is a genre that does much better on streaming as opposed to theatrically. And thus as a best case scenario, you’ll instead get movies like Jennifer Lawrence’s “No Hard Feelings,” which opened to $15 million in the summer of 2023 and finished with $50.5 million. Or in a worse case scenario, you’ll get movies like “Joy Ride” from that same summer that opened to $5.8 million, despite great reviews. Or a slightly different style of action comedy, “Novocaine” from this year that opened to $8.8 million. “Bride Hard” does have name recognition with its stars and if it gets good reviews, that’ll obviously help. But it still seems like a movie that hits in the $8-12 million range.
June 27 – 29
![]() |
Universal's "M3GAN 2.0" |
The final weekend of June has quite the unique showdown before July comes around and sees the likes of “Jurassic World: Rebirth” and “Superman” dominate the market. I’m honestly not sure which of these two new movies from this weekend will come out on top, but my gut instinct says to mention M3GAN 2.0 first. The first movie became quite the sensation in January 2023, being a horror movie about an A.I. doll that was programmed to be a child’s best friend and protector, while helping out the parents quite a bit. And because A.I. in Hollywood movies never turns out well, M3GAN’s programming became quite faulty as she became a little too protective and resorting to quite the extreme violence in the process. What was initially thought of as a potential throwaway January horror film, not only got great reaction out of audiences and critics, but opened to $30.4 million and finished just shy of $100 million domestically with $95.2 million. Now Universal is confident enough with this in regards to franchise potential that they made the decision to release the sequel as a big summer horror film. M3GAN is now upgraded and better than ever, ready to cause more chaos? Horror sequels have always had a shaky reputation at the box office, but yet it’s perhaps the most commonly franchised genre because they often come with a much lower budget. Point in case, “M3GAN” made, as mentioned, $95.2 million domestically, as well as $181.8 million worldwide. The budget was just $12 million. So with that in mind, “M3GAN 2.0” doesn’t necessarily need to do super well to be a success, but given how popular the movie was, and how viral her dancing went on Tik Tok, a sequel has the potential to blow, especially considering the PG-13 rating leaves it very open for the teen market. This could easily improve upon the first movie’s $30.4 million opening.
If “M3GAN 2.0” underperforms, or does well, but not as well as the first, then the other movie that could very easily win out this weekend is F1: The Movie. Despite being released two weekends after Father’s Day, this does nevertheless give off vibes as the most “Dad Movie” of the summer. The premise is about a former Formula One driver who is forced into retirement after a major accident who is asked to come out of retirement to help mentor a new rookie driver. The movie has Brad Pitt in the lead role and is directed by Joseph Kosinski, director of “Top Gun: Maverick.” I suppose in an absolute dream scenario, Kosinski would love to have another hit on the level of “Top Gun: Maverick,” but the real easy and likely much more realistic comparison would be to fellow racing movie, “Ford v. Ferrari,” which opened to $31.5 million in November 2019. That movie went onto make $117.6 million domestically and $224.4 million worldwide, so it held really well. It also got a handful of Oscar nominations that year. Could a summer release with all the IMAX screens lead to a much higher opening in the $50-60 million range? Seems like a possibility. It does make it interesting though as both major releases this weekend, “M3GAN 2.0” and “F1,” both have easy comparisons that opened at almost the exact same level. Will they both hit that range? Will one be a breakout hit, while the other one disappoints? That will obviously be determined by audience reaction and overall reviews. And regardless of what happens, they each will have just five days in theaters before “Jurassic World: Rebirth” roars onto the screens on Wednesday, July 2.
While the aforementioned duel should be interesting to follow, there is a third movie getting released and that’s the A24 drama Sorry, Baby, which had its debut earlier this year at Sundance, getting very positive remarks as it currently has a 96 percent score on Rotten Tomatoes after 50 reviews. The movie is the feature-length directorial debut of Eva Victor, who wrote and directed this movie, but also stars in the movie as the lead role of a woman named Agnes who went through a traumatic event and has to figure out how to move forward. The movie has been described as being unfiltered and frank in both its tragedy and comedy, balancing the line of being darkly humorous as well as extremely poignant. A summer film with breakout potential for all audiences? Perhaps not. But smaller films out of festivals are scattered across the release calendar as options for those who desire something unique or original. Giant blockbuster films aren’t the only ones released during the summer months.