Saturday, January 29, 2022

Movies of 2022: The Good, the Bad, and the Maybe

Welcome to the year 2022! I am excited to once again be bringing back one of my favorite yearly segments, my big yearly movie preview. I didn’t do this last year because we still had no idea what was going to be coming out. And while COVID still exists and the release schedule remains fluid to a certain extent, 2021 was a positive year in regards to box office recovery that ended in “Spider-Man: No Way Home” earning $1.7 billion at the worldwide box office and counting. So I am confident enough in the state of the industry to once again do this post. Movies will come out and it’s time to preview them! Even if I’m wrong and the world ends again, I enjoyed looking back at my 2020 post for this and I wish I had done a 2021 post. So regardless of what happens, we’re doing this and I will be curious looking back on this to compare what came out and what was better or worse than what I was expecting.

If you’re new to this post for whatever reason, this is not an all-encompassing list of everything coming out, but I take a lot of the major highlights of what’s currently on my radar and separate them into three categories: “The Good,” “The Bad,” and “The Maybe,” with brief commentary on each. Yeah, this post is always long, but I organize it in a way that hopefully makes it fun for you to look through and get yourself excited or scared for what’s coming our way. The order here is by release date, so this isn’t a ranked list. And as always, let me know which movies you are most excited for. I’m curious to know what you think.

And since we are one month in, if you’re curious about January, check out my January preview that I did earlier in the month. Or just know that “Scream” was really the only highlight. I wasn’t excited for it, and I haven’t seen it just yet, but it got better than expected reviews. The other three releases, “The 355,” “The King’s Daughter,” and “Redeeming Love,” all got critically panned and barely made a dent at the box office. Typical January affair. And no, “Cyrano” did not come out. But the anime “Belle” got a wide expansion, so that’s another highlight. Anyways, now it’s on to the main event!


The Good:


Death on the Nile
February 11

One of those movies that was supposed to come out in 2020 and has seen about a thousand new release dates since. Blame COVID for all of that. But this is the sequel to “Murder on the Orient Express,” a movie that I really enjoyed. Both “Murder on the Orient Express” and “Death on the Nile” are based on Agatha Christie novels. Kenneth Branagh is back to direct and star and has a whole new cast of big names joining him, highlighted by Gal Gadot, Annette Benning, and Russell Brand. Not bad timing for Branagh, either, as he’s about to get showered with Oscar nominations for his movie “Belfast” right before this movie’s release.

The BatmanMarch 4

Need I really say anything about this? It’s Batman, for crying out loud. And I’m a long time DC fan. Matt Reeves, director of the new Planet of the Apes trilogy, is in charge, with Robert Pattinson as Batman, an absolutely fantastic choice. If you’re still whining about “Twilight,” get yourself out of 2008 and enter 2022. Both Pattinson and Kristen Stewart are two of the industry’s best actors. And “The Batman” looks like it’s a dark, psychological thriller in the vein of “Se7en,” but with Batman characters. I can’t wait to dive into all three hours of it!

Turning RedMarch 11 (Disney+)

I feel really bad for Pixar. Their third straight movie that got yanked off the theatrical schedule and dumped on Disney+. But hey, “Encanto” has gone absolutely crazy since getting put on Disney+, so maybe Disney knows what they’re doing? But yeah, I’m always excited for a new Pixar movie! Especially a Pixar original. They rarely miss with those.

The Adam ProjectMarch 11 (Netflix)

Outside catching my attention because it has my name in it, when I looked up what this movie was, I learned that it’s Shawn Levy, director of “Free Guy,” re-teaming with Ryan Reynolds, star of “Free Guy.” That’s all I needed to know. It’s an action/adventure time travel thing. I’m not 100 percent sure that it’s actually getting released on March 11, but whenever Netflix decides to put this out, I’m immediately pressing play within minutes, if I can.

The Lost CityMarch 25

I watched the trailer for this and was won over. Sandra Bullock is an author and Channing Tatum is her book cover model. A crazy sequence of events has them on a cutthroat jungle adventure together. I’ve never heard of the directors, Aaron and Adam Nee, but Brad Pitt and Daniel Radcliffe also co-star. This looks like it could be a fun, sleeper hit.

Sonic the Hedgehog 2 April 8

We’ve come a long way since the original trailer for “Sonic” was released. The director listened to the fans, completely reanimated the movie, and released a final product that looked good and was a lot of fun. Then COVID hit a month later, making it the second highest grossing movie of the year… by default. Crazy that it’s been two years since all of that, but this sequel looks a lot of fun and adds both Tails and Knuckles to the mix.

The Bad GuysApril 22

When I looked this up, my first impression was that it looked like a really silly and dumb kids movie, but then I saw it was DreamWorks and was caught off guard that they had a movie coming out in a couple of months that I had never heard about. DreamWorks is always hit and miss, but watching this trailer was a bit of a romp. Maybe they won me over by having “Bad Guy” by Billie Eilish as their trailer song, but it also looks like one of the fun and wacky DreamWorks movie. A team of animals trying to pull off a heist. I’m always down for a fun heist movie, especially one as wacky as this trailer makes it out as.

The NorthmanApril 22

No, I don’t rank these movies by most anticipated, but if I did, this is No. 1. Yes, ahead of “The Batman” and all the Marvel stuff that you’ll eventually see. It’s the director of “The Witch,” one of my favorite movies of last decade, and “The Lighthouse,” an extremely solid follow-up. This guy likes diving into different historical eras to tell intense and edge-of-your seat stories that are accurate to the era. And with “The Northman,” he’s diving into the Vikings. And he’s bringing back Anya Taylor-Joy from “The Witch” and Willem Dafoe from “The Lighthouse,” along with Alexander Skarsgard, Nicole Kidman, and Ethan Hawke.

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of MadnessMay 6

But of course all of the Marvel movies are going to be on this list. They’ve been on a 13-year winning streak with very few bumps in the road, so why would I doubt them? And I’m actually more excited for this current era of Marvel than I have any other era simply because they can tell whatever story they want with whatever characters and people will show up because the Marvel brand is so huge. So many new opportunities that I’m excited about. But with this one, “Doctor Strange” is still one of my top MCU films and I love multiverse stuff. Plus, Sam Raimi is returning to the superhero movie genre, so that has me excited! I would’ve hoped for Scott Derrickson to return, but if we can’t have him, Sam Raimi sounds like the perfect replacement.

DC League of Super PetsMay 20

OK, I saw this one on the schedule quite some time ago and laughed pretty good. DC is doing whatever the heck they want. They’ve completely abandoned their stint of copying Marvel and are just throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks. The result is some pretty ugly lows, but also some insanely fun highs. And why not make an animated movie about all the super pets from the comic books? I just hope they don’t dive too deep into the bottom of the barrel humor often found in kid-targeted animated movies because this could be fun.

Top Gun: MaverickMay 27

Is this finally coming out? I wasn’t excited for it originally, but the initial trailer that dropped before COVID hit had me convinced that this could be fun. I’m mostly curious to see it finally come out after being one of the COVID victims, but if I can’t have Tom Cruise in “Mission: Impossible 7” this year (it got delayed when I was putting together this list), then I suppose him in “Maverick” will have to hold me over for now.

LightyearJune 17

Crossing my fingers that Disney keeps this one in theaters. Pixar deserves to finally get a theatrically-released film. And given the Toy Story connection, I think their current plan is to keep it on the schedule, but we’ll see. The premise of this movie is a bit confusing to describe to other people, and that may result in confusion among casual movie-goers that this isn’t exactly the Toy Story spin-off that they might be expecting and it’s Chris Evans voicing Buzz Lightyear instead of Tim Allen. But once you wrap your mind around what they’re trying to do, a Lightyear-related space adventure done by Pixar should be a fun time.

ElvisJune 24

I’m not sure of “Elvis” is the official title of this movie, I’ve seen it still listed as untitled Elvis project in some places. But we’re on a kick of musical biopics of late and Elvis is finally getting his due. Baz Luhrmann is here to direct and he’s always selective with what he chooses to do. “The Great Gatsby” in 2013 was his most recent feature-length movie he directed. In fact, since “Mulan Rouge!” in 2001, he’s only directed two movies. So I pay attention whenever his name shows up. Austin Butler, a fairly unknown actor, is playing Elvis, with Tom Hanks on board to play a supporting role. Not all musical biopics work, but I trust Baz to do Elvis right.

Thor: Love and ThunderJuly 8

Taika Waititi is back on board to direct another Thor movie. With “Ragnorak,” he took a dying Marvel franchise with a character few cared about and instantaneously made him one of everyone’s favorite. And now with many of the OG Avengers gone or retired, Thor is still alive and kicking. So of course I’m stoked to see what Taika has in store next. “Love and Thunder” sounds like such a Taika subtitle and I love it. And he also has Natalie Portman’s Jane Foster coming back and playing a Female Thor? Or Jane getting Thor-like powers? That sounds like a risky move, but I have full trust that Taika knows what he’s doing.

NopeJuly 22

Yep. This is Jordan Peele’s next movie. After “Get Out” and “Us,” I think every horror fan is super excited for pretty much anything he has in store. I don’t even know what this is about, but I don’t care. It’s Jordan Peele’s next movie. That’s all we need to know.

Black AdamJuly 29

If “The Batman” is too dark for your taste and “DC League of Super Pets” is too childish, then this might be DC’s most widely accessible movie of the year, especially since there are questions about “The Flash” and “Aquaman 2” that I’ll get into later. I’m excited for all of DC’s movies for different reasons, but “Black Adam” is DC adding Dwayne Johnson to their roster of characters and Dwayne Johnson is super excited to be bringing this character to life. It’s also in the Shazam-verse of whatever DC’s timeline is right now. And “Shazam!” is one of DC’s best recent films. The character of Black Adam is an anti-hero that I assume is going to be a big player in the “Shazam!” sequel that’s currently scheduled for 2023. If not, they’ll cross paths eventually. And whenever that is, I’m excited for it to happen.

Don’t Worry DarlingSeptember 23

Olivia Wilde’s second feature-length directorial effort. And she did quite well for herself in “Booksmart,” a movie I never saw but heard very strong praises across the board. And by the looks of the poster and premise, she’s diving into the horror/thriller realm. Florence Pugh and Harry Styles star in a movie about a 1950s housewife learning that her husband’s company is hiding disturbing secrets. I’ll perhaps revisit my thoughts when a trailer is out and we know more, but initial information has my curiosity piqued.

Puss in Boots: The Last WishSeptember 23

I saw this on the schedule and I initially didn’t believe it. They’ve been trying to make this Puss in Boots sequel for years, almost right after the first on came out in late 2011. But it’s gone through so many delays and changes, most notably when DreamWorks restructured their whole company after a string of failures. They dumped so many movies and this was one of them. “The Croods 2” was in the same boat and finally came out at the end of 2020, so maybe this is real? If it is, I’m on board because “Puss in Boots” was a fun Shrek spin-off that felt more like a Zorro movie than a Shrek movie. There’s a lot of options to take the franchise if they are want to continue, so I’m up for the adventure.

Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse - Part OneOctober 7

I’m a bit weary of the “Part One” designation here. If they’re announcing off the bat with that title that this is only going to be half of a movie, I fear disappointment could be in this movie’s future. It’s also hard to catch lightning in a bottle twice. But those nitpicks aside, this is the sequel to “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse.” That alone is cause for excitement. There’s so much in this universe that I want to see and I’m ready to continue exploring.

DisenchantedFall 2022 (Disney+)

Speaking of a movie that should’ve happened a decade ago, it should not have taken a full 15 years to get a sequel to “Enchanted.” But it’s finally happening, with Amy Adams, Patrick Dempsey, Idina Menzel, and James Marsden are all back on board. Belated sequels are often a cause for worry. But hopefully they’ve spent this time getting the script right because “Enchanted” is one of my favorite live-action Disney movies. It deserves a good sequel. I don’t know when this is coming. Disney didn’t set a date. They just said Fall of 2022.

The FlashNovember 4

I almost put this one in the maybe category, if I’m being honest. It’s finally our first live action film version of “The Flash,” something that baffles me that it took until 2022 to do when the Flash is one of the most popular DC characters. And that’s cause for excitement. It’s also cause for excitement that Michael Keaton’s Batman will be back in this movie. How? Well, it’s the Flash. If you’ve watched any of the now eight seasons of the Grant Gustin led TV show on the CW, you’ll know that multiverse and wacky timelines are their specialty. The problem for me, though, is that they’ve gone through so many production issues here that it worries me. Lots of directors and lots of story ideas. I think they’re still doing Flashpoint, but I’m not so sure anymore. And the last time they did a panel on a DC event for this movie, there didn’t seem to be as much positive energy as the other projects. I hope they got it all figured out, but I worry.

Untitled Bee Gees BiopicNovember 4

Again, like I mentioned with the Elvis biopic, musical biopics are the popular thing to do. If they do it right, there is a lot of interesting story to tell with the Bee Gees. So I’m willing to be excited for it. This is Kenneth Branagh again directing. Yes, that means he’s been busy with this, “Death on the Nile,” and “Belfast.” But I’m assuming “Death on the Nile” was finished ages ago and has just been waiting for Disney to decide to release it. So he has time. Although outside Branagh directing and it being a Bee Gees biopic, I know nothing else about this. IMDb doesn’t even have a cast or writers listed. So is this one even on track?

Black Panther: Wakanda ForeverNovember 11

And the Marvel movie I have the most questions about is undoubtedly this Black Panther sequel. As we all know, Chadwick Boseman tragically passed away and the whole world wishes he were still here to do this sequel. And I’m sure everyone at Marvel wishes that, too. And I’m sure they have it all figured out to properly honor his legacy and make a movie that he’d be proud of. They’ve just kept it all under wraps, so I don’t know what their plan is, outside saying that they won’t be recasting Black Panther. Just having someone take over the mantle, I’m assuming. But who? And will the result be as smooth as everyone hopes? I’m sure we’ll eventually get an idea when they decided to release a trailer and start advertising, but that might not be until the summer until after “Thor: Love and Thunder” gets released.

She SaidNovember 18

This is where we get into Oscar territory. Predicting what movies are going to be big players this far in advance is nearly impossible. But on paper this one seems like it will at least have people’s attention. It’s the story of the “Me Too” movement, specifically in regards to sexual assault allegations against Harvey Weinstein, as exposed by New York Times journalists Megan Twohey and Jodi Kantor. So this has the potential to be one of the most important movies of the year. Directed by Maria Schrader and starring Carey Mulligan and Zoe Kazan as the two reporters. Based on the 2019 book by Twohey and Kantor.

Creed IIINovember 23

I am a big fan of the Rocky franchise and so I’m always excited when a new entry comes along. Michael B. Jordan did an excellent job of taking on the mantle from Sylvester Stallone and both Creed movies were really good. And this time around, Michael B. Jordan is directing the movie in what will be his directorial debut. They haven’t revealed much of anything else about the movie just yet, but I’ll be down for whatever fight they have in store.

The FabelmansNovember 23

Another very early Oscar projection is that it could be the year of Steven Spielberg. Think of “Roma” or “Belfast” with “The Fabelmans,” but for Spielberg. A semi-autobiographical film directed by him about his life growing up. Michelle Williams, Seth Rogen, and Paul Dano are the top billed cast members for this, with a young actor named Gabriel LaBelle playing Sammy Fabelman, the representation of Speilberg. Most of Spielberg’s movies get showered with Oscars, but it’s been since “Saving Private Ryan” in 1999 that he won best director and “Schindler’s List” in 1994 since a movie of his has won best picture. Will this be the year they reward him again, assuming “West Side Story” doesn’t win the 2021 best picture?

Strange WorldNovember 23

The next entry for Walt Disney Animation Studios. And they love this Thanksgiving release date. There’s not a whole lot they’ve released in regards to plot and voice cast because they’re focused on advertising the two Pixar movies at the moment. What I can piece together is that the plot revolves around a family of explorers. IMDb lists Alan Tudyk as a cast member. And Don Hall is directing. He was one of the co-directors on “Raya,” “Moana” and “Big Hero 6. But anyways, it’s a Disney animated movie. That’s enough for me to be excited.

Aquaman and the Lost KingdomDecember 16

Look, I’m not happy about the whole Johnny Depp and Amber Heard thing either. But am I going to boycott “Aquaman 2” because Warner Bros. is keeping Amber Heard in the movie after firing Johnny Depp from Fantastic Beasts, when it maybe should’ve been the other way around? Or at least get rid of both of them? No, I’m not. Because there’s so many others involved with this movie who had nothing to do with all of that and are innocently just trying to make another fun Aquaman movie. And I rather enjoyed the first Aquaman, so I’m excited to see what James Wan has in store next.

BabylonDecember 25

It’s Damien Chazelle’s next movie. That’s all I need to be excited. “La La Land” was also one of my top movies of last decade and “Whiplash” before that was high up on my list, too. I even interviewed Chazelle over the phone when I did my internship for Deseret News, so you might say I’m invested in what he does. The subject matter is pre-code Hollywood in the 20s and 30s and the stars are Brad Pitt, Tobey Maguire, Olivia Wilde, and Margot Robbie. But the Damien Chazelle aspect of this is what really has be drawn in.

BlondeTBD 2022 (Netflix)

I don’t know when Netflix is planning on releasing this movie. They don’t really reveal that until they’re ready to start advertising, but this is another buzzy film that I’ve been hearing early word of in regards to the awards circuit. It’s a movie about Marilyn Monroe. And yes, we’ve had a movie like that before. But buzz I’ve been hearing is that this is a more intense version that perhaps is less sugar-coated when it comes to her story. Maybe that means it’s not quite as accessible to the general audience, but her story is a very interesting and tragic one. Ana de Armas is playing Marilyn Monroe and she’s a great actress who deserves more attention.

Knives Out 2TBD 2022 (Netflix)

Again, no idea when Netflix is releasing this. But they paid a lot of money for the rights to stream the “Knives Out” sequels. I think this is slated for the end of the year. And there’s a chance they push into 2023 if they’re not ready for it. But Rian Johnson is back to write and direct. Daniel Craig is back as Benoit Blanc. And alongside Daniel Craig is a huge list of stars completely different than the first movie. New story. New mystery. New characters. But if it’s the same tone and feel as the first “Knives Out,” give me all of the sequels. I’m a bit disappointed that this is a Netflix movie and not a theatrical movie. But hey, Netflix has released some of their recent movies in theaters, so maybe they’ll do that here.

 

The Bad:


Home Team
January 28 (Netflix)

OK, so this movie is already out on Netflix right now, so maybe this is cheating, but Adam Sandler’s production company, Happy Madison Productions, is responsible for this movie. And most of the time those movies are harmless garbage not worth mentioning, but this time they made a movie about NFL head coach Sean Payton during the time when he was suspended from coaching. Which is all fine and dandy, but Kevin James is playing Sean Payton. Like, what? Kevin James might have the same hair color as Sean Payton, but that’s about as far as the comparisons go. It might be the most hilariously bad casting choice I’ve heard.

MoonfallFebruary 4

It’s Roland Emmerich. He doesn’t make good movies. Sure, at first I was curious about a sci-fi action movie, albeit confused as to why it’s coming out in a few days and I’ve barely heard of it. But then I saw Roland’s name and was immediately like, no thank you. And if your argument back is that he made “Independence Day,” my comeback will be, yeah… and when? Because that’s literally the last time he made a movie that’s worth anything. And even that movie might be a tad bit overrated and nostalgia fueled.

BlacklightFebruary 11

It might be low-hanging fruit to hate on all these February movies, but are we done with these generic Liam Neeson action movies? He makes one or two of them a year now and they’re never worth anything. If you’ve seen one of these poorly done Taken rip-offs (a movie that’s not that good, anyways), you’ve seen all of that. And that’s all this is.

UnchartedFebruary 18

Movies based on video games rarely work. I personally know nothing about “Uncharted.” I’m not a gamer. And so people confused at the Tom Holland casting is not why I’m low on this, even though I do understand the worry about him looking absolutely nothing like the character in the games. It’s better to cast someone who can pull off the character rather than casting someone just because they’re popular. My worry as a neutral onlooker is that this just looks extremely generic and boring. Like we’ve seen this movie a hundred times before and this adds nothing new. I’m ready to add it to the long list of video game movies that have completely failed. It’s not a coincidence. The genre doesn’t present itself to movie format.

The Texas Chainsaw MassacreFebruary 18 (Netflix)

Horror movies are a dime a dozen. They cost little to make and thus it’s easy to make a profit, so I’m used to them milking franchises to death. It’s whatever. But “Halloween” set an annoying trend of doing reboot/sequels of classic horror franchises with the same exact title as the original. So now apparently EVERY horror franchise has to follow suit. And this one doesn’t even look like they’re trying. Hire a no-name director, a cast that you’ve mostly never heard of, and throw it straight to Netflix. And I’m willing to bet they’ll ignore everything about what made the first movie so effective and be an empty killfest instead.

Cheaper by the DozenMarch 2022 (Disney+)

File this into the category of remakes that I don’t think anyone needed or asked for. It’s Gabrielle Union and Zach Braff, if you’re curious. And a straight to Disney+ movie that doesn’t even have a trailer yet. Just a couple of months ago Disney said this is March of 2022 on Disney+, so they might want to start advertising it. Or maybe they know it’s really bad and are just planning on using it as watch-bait for the five-year-olds. Not that straight to Disney+ is an indication of quality. They’re putting everything they can on Disney+ and have some exciting ones coming. But Disney+ is also the new Disney Channel Original Movies thing. And to me this looks like exactly that. See “Home Sweet Home Alone,” for example.

MorbiusApril 1

I don’t want to just follow the trends and jump on the Jared Leto hate bandwagon. But he’s not doing himself a whole lot of favors, either. “Morbius” is another one of those movies that has been the victim of COVID delays. And I don’t think it looks quite as bad as some claim it does, but every time they push it back, I feel myself less interested in seeing what they have to offer. It doesn’t help that this is one of Sony’s solo adventures. They’ve done very well with the help of Marvel Studios and Kevin Feige, but both Venom movies have left something to be desired for, even if I think the first is better than some give it credit. Even beyond that, their record is quite spotty and don’t know if a vampire villain movie is something that was that great of an idea in the first place. We’ve kinda overdone the vampire genre.

AmbulanceApril 8

It’s Michael Bay. Granted, he has a slightly better track record than Roland Emmerich. The 2016 movie “13 Hours” was just fine. And his 90s films were perfect for their time. But still, I’m not going to let myself get excited for a new Michael Bay movie, especially not one about two robbers that steal an ambulance after their heist goes bad, even if it does star Jake Gyllenhaal and Yahya Abdul-Mateen II. You watch the trailer and you see all the Michael Bay style of explosions and you roll your eyes because the guy just can’t help himself.

Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of DumbledoreApril 15

If you see my “Aquaman 2” discussion above, you’ll know that I’m not boycotting the movie just because Amber Heard is still in it. Likewise, it’s only fair for me to not boycott the latest Fantastic Beasts movie simply because they unfairly fired Johnny Depp. I’ll see the movie. But I got burned hard by “Crimes of Grindelwald.” It was a terrible movie in just about every way. JK Rowling should not write movie scripts. It’s different than writing a book. And it’s baffling that she seemed to have no idea how well people knew her books given how many gross inconsistencies there were in the movie. Not to mention it was a poorly structured movie in its own right that wasn’t interesting. With that background in mind, we have the title that instantly became a meme and a punchline and a trailer that just delivered nothing.

Jurassic World: DominionJune 10

The small bit of hope that I have for this third Jurassic World movie is that Colin Trevorrow said that he wanted to make a Jurassic movie where the dinosaurs are running free around the world. And this is exactly what this movie will be. That means the previous two movies literally only existed to set up this movie, so I hope it turns out. But I am really sick and tired of watching dumb people make dumb decisions just so we can watch dinosaurs run around and eat people. “Jurassic Park” was a horror movie. And it was an insanely smart, well set-up, intense horror movie. It absolutely infuriates me that this movie devolved into a brainless action film with no plot and no intelligence. And I’m even more infuriated that many don’t care and love it anyways, because… DINOSAURS. That’s literally some people’s only defense. “Adam, I know what you are saying is right, but I don’t care. I love it because DINOSAURS.” Well, do you know what? You can go drool all over yourself watching dinosaurs on screen. I’ll be in my corner crying that they removed the heart and soul out of my favorite franchise and completely tossed in the trash. I’m not mad. Not at all.

Halloween EndsOctober 14

No. I don’t believe it. These horror franchises will never end. So how DARE you insult my intelligence by claiming in the title that this is the final Halloween movie. I’m not that stupid. Also, your previous movie sucked, that being 2021’s “Halloween Kills,” of course.

Hocus Pocus 2Fall 2022 (Disney+)

The original “Hocus Pocus” is a bad movie. It’s a really, really bad movie. And the prime example of how holiday nostalgia can singlehandedly boost a bad movie and trick you into thinking it’s something great and special. So, no, I don’t care that they’re finally doing a sequel to this bizarre phenomenon that is the atrocity of “Hocus Pocus.”

PinocchioFall 2022 (Disney+)

OK, I’m not a part of the band wagon that hates all of these Disney live action remakes and will automatically dread every one of them. There is a decent chance that this one could be good. I’ve enjoyed plenty of them. But do you realize how many times the story of “Pinocchio” has been made and remade? It’s rather ridiculous. But the real reason that this movie is on here is that we’re getting TWO of them this year. Because of that, they’re both going on the bad list and will have an uphill battle in trying to prove themselves. This one is Disney’s version, going straight to Disney+ at some point and is directed by Robert Zemeckis, who himself is on a bit of a losing streak. But hey, Tom Hanks is Geppetto. I like that casting choice.

Avatar 2December 16

I bet this isn’t the list you expected this movie to be on. Maybe this is a hot take, but I think “Avatar 2” is going to be a widely disliked movie that is going to vastly underperform. Here’s the thing. “Avatar” was a groundbreaking, revolutionary cinematic experience with what it did for 3D. People saw it and loved it because of the 3D and the visual experience that brought. And THAT’S why it became the highest grossing movie ever worldwide. Fast forward 13 years and no one cares about 3D anymore. It’s not even really a thing that is offered. The plot of the movie was never the strength. In fact, the plot is really generic and bad. So explain to me what the draw of an “Avatar 2” is when the reason people loved it is not a thing anymore? I think people are going to be really burned out of this franchise long before “Avatar 5” comes out in 2028. Yes, you heard that right. Instead of making one movie and releasing in in 2012 like he should’ve, James Cameron spent the last 13 years making FOUR sequels at once. And I think that’s going to wind up being a massive mistake.

MarioDecember 21

Call me weird, but I’m really happy that this movie is coming and I hope it is a massive success for Illumination. So why do I say that, then proceed to put it in the bad section? Well. Allow me to explain. There’s a 90s live action Mario movie that is one of the worst movies ever. But since that’s the only Mario movie, it is currently “the” Mario movie, if you know what I mean. I’m glad that we get to erase that movie’s title of being “the” Mario movie. Also, there are so many awesome Nintendo properties that deserve movies that could potentially be on the way if this Mario movie does really well. So I’m rooting for it. But Mario is not a franchise that lends itself to an interesting story. And I say that as one of the biggest Mario fans there is. It’s also Illumination and most of their movies are bad. And they have a weird cast that includes Chris Pratt as the voice of Mario. That makes no sense at all.

Blade of the 47 RoninTBD 2022 (Netflix)

Remember that 2013 movie starring Keanu Reeves called “47 Ronin”? If you don’t, that’s because it was really bad and did terrible at the box office. So naturally it makes sense to do a sequel ten years after it came out. And it’s not something that has developed a cult following since it flopped. It’s just a bad movie with no fans that is getting a sequel. The positive note is that it’s a completely different cast and crew. So maybe it’ll be an actual Samurai movie instead of a bad American movie pretending to be a Samurai movie?

PinocchioTBD 2022 (Netflix)

I told you we had two Pinocchio movies coming out this year. This is the non-Disney version heading to Netflix probably around the same ballpark as Disney’s version is going to Disney+. Neither has a date. But this one is a stop-motion animation version with Guillermo del Torro directing. That’s kinda cool. But I still don’t know if it’s necessary. It’s also described as a darker version of the story. And Pinocchio is dark enough as is, so I really don’t know if we need a darker version of an already dark story.

 

The Maybe:


Jackass Forever
February 4

I have no interest in these guys. But I know many people who do. Just a bunch of grown men who are pre-teens at heart doing dangerous stunts and getting beaten up and punched around. I know there’s a name for this type of physical comedy, but I can’t think of it. Granted, I’ll watch my fair share of dumb YouTube videos of people getting hurt. And I can watch the MTV show “Ridiculousness” for hours. But something about people purposely hurting themselves to get people to laugh at them I think is weird. But I’m putting this here as an FYI if you do like these guys.

Marry MeFebruary 11

The cute romance movie for Valentine’s Day. It seems harmless and the right crowd will probably enjoy it. Jennifer Lopez plays a superstar and Owen Wilson plays the nobody she pulls up onto stage and decides to marry instead of her celebrity fiancé. But I don’t know, when I watch the trailer and see Owen Wilson playing the nobody, it just seems kinda weird. As much as I love him as an actor, he’s not the type of guy that can blend. I think it would work better if they cast a lesser known actor to play his part?

DogFebruary 18

A movie about a man and his dog. Channing Tatum stars and co-directs. He’s a former Army Ranger and the do is a former Army dog. They are paired together against their will and learn to get along. Seems like a cute movie.

SneakerellaFebruary 18 (Disney+)

OK, now speaking of Disney Channel Original Movie, this one totally has that vibe. The story of Cinderella, but set around modern-day sneakers. Depending on your view of DCOMs, you might love this or hate this. It’s probably going to be bad, but the right audience won’t care.

Downton Abbey: A New EraMarch 18

Another FYI sort of thing. One day I’ll watch “Downton Abbey.” I’ve heard great things and I’d probably enjoy it. It’s just not too terribly high on my list of shows to catch up on. The first movie they did a couple of years ago did really well, so it makes sense for them to make another one and keep the franchise going.

Operation Furtune: Ruse de guerreMarch 18

A Guy Ritchie movie starring Jason Statham. It’s probably all you need to know. You’re either in or out based on that statement. And that’s the running theme so far with this part of the list. Niche movies for niche audiences. Nothing wrong with that.

The Unbreakable BoyMarch 18

A PG-rated family-friendly drama about a young boy with a rare bone disease and autism. A very tough allotment in life that he takes with the most cheerful approach possible. Reading that premise reminds me of the movie “Wonder,” which the poster has right on the top. “From the studio that brought you ‘Wonder.’” Zachary Levi stars and the director is Jon Gunn, the director of “The Case for Christ” and “Do You Believe,” so this also could be an Easter-themed religious movie, but I’m not 100 percent sure if that’s the exact angle they’re going.

Thirteen LivesApril 15

This is a drama about a group of young boys in Thailand and their soccer coach that guy trapped in some underground caves and the rescue mission that is assembled to save them. It’s a Ron Howard directed movie with Colin Farrell, Viggo Mortensen, and Joel Edgerton in lead roles.

65April 29

I sometimes get weary of April releases, especially ones released at the end of April that we know is going to get drowned out immediately by the summer movie season. But this is a sci-fi thriller about an astronaut crash landing on a mysterious planet. It stars Adam Driver and the director the director team of Scott Beck and Bryan Woods were writers that helped on “A Quiet Place.” So there’s enough there to get me intrigued.

Bob’s BurgersMay 27

Another FYI entry here. I’ve never seen “Bob’s Burgers” and don’t really have a strong desire to. But those who are fans might be interested in this movie.

The Black PhoneJune 24

This is a horror movie that has been decently well advertised in movies that I’ve gone to. And if I’m being honest, it looks like an extremely generic horror movie. And maybe it still will be, but I looked up the cast and crew and it’s a Scott Derrickson movie. He’s the director of “Doctor Strange,” as well as horror movies such as “Sinister,” “Deliver Us from Evil” and “The Exorcism of Emily Rose.” So his name makes me slightly more curious.

Bullet TrainJuly 15

A David Leitch directed action movie. He’s one of the two “John Wick” directors, the one that went onto direct “Atomic Blonde,” “Deadpool 2” and “Hobbs & Shaw,” while letting the other guy, Chad Stahelski, direct the other “John Wick” sequels. I think Stahelski has proven to be the better of the two, but I’m still curious about a David Leitch movie. This one stars Brad Pitt, Sandra Bullock, Zazie Beetz, and several others and is about five assassins on a train.

Blazing SamuraiJuly 22

An animated movie that looks like it’ll be fun for the kids. It’s essentially a parody of Mel Brooks’ “Blazing Saddles,” which is directly mentioned on the poster, alongside “The Lion King” and “Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs.” The poster has a giant cat that looks like he’s in a Samurai outfit, which also reminds me of “Kung Fu Panda.” So it looks like it’s trying to be a fun parody of a bunch of other movies. And I would be more excited if it was actually from a major animated studio, but it’s Paramount Animation trying their best to join the animation game after being founded in 2011 and having mixed success, so I’m just a bit skeptic.

The Man from TorontoAugust 12

An August action movie from the director of “The Hitman’s Bodyguard,” along with its sequel. It probably knows exactly what it is. The premise is about the world’s deadliest assassin and New York’s biggest screw-up being mistake for each other. Kaley Cuoco, Woody Harrelson, and Kevin Hart star in the movie. I’m not quite sure which one is who.

SamaritanAugust 26

This is a movie that I might be slightly more excited for if it wasn’t for the late August release date. Maybe that’s unfair, but where a studio decides to put a movie can say a lot about their confidence in said movie. But that aside, if anyone remembers the 2018 movie “Overlord,” which was essentially a zombie D-Day movie, this is the same director. And I thought that movie was a lot of fun, which is why I’m curious about this one. The premise is about a young boy learning that a superhero who was thought to go missing 20 years previously might still be around. Sylvester Stallone is one of the lead stars in the movie.

Dark HarvestSeptember 9

Warner Bros. learned with “IT” that the second weekend of September is a really good one to release a horror movie. And they’ve take that spot every year since. This is not that movie. That’s coming up next. But other studios have decided they want to join the club. So we currently have two horror movies on the schedule for this weekend. “Dark Harvest” is from United Artists and is about a monster called October Boy that rises from the cornfields every Halloween. Based on the 2006 horror novel by Norman Partridge. The director is David Slade, who has directed a few “Black Mirror” episodes and other random projects.

Salem’s LotSeptember 9

This is the Warner Bros. horror movie that I was just referencing. They put a horror movie on this weekend every year. And this is said movie for 2022. It’s based on a Stephen King novel about a writer who travels to a town where people become vampires. The director is Gary Dauberman, an in-house name for Warner Bros., it appears. He directed the third Annabelle movie and helped out as a writer on some of these other Warner Bros. horrors, like “IT,” “The Nun,” and all three Anabelle movies. I don’t know which of these horror movies are going to be a hit, or if they’re both going to stay on that date. But I now have my eye on both.

White Bird: A Wonder StorySeptember 16

A movie about a young Jewish girl hidden by a boy and his family in Nazi-occupied France during World War II. So we’ve seen a lot of movies like this and they’re sometimes really good. I don’t know if this is going to be on the level of “Jojo Rabbit” or “The Book Thief,” but it’s worth watching out for at the least. Marc Forster is the director. He did “Christopher Robin” and “Finding Neverland,” so he’s done his fair share of feel-good movies. He also directed “Quantum of Solace” and “World War Z,” so you can say that he has a varied resume.

Untitled David O. Russell ProjectNovember 4

David O. Russell is one of those directors who, when he releases a movie, all the Awards people pay attention. “The Fighter,” “Silver Linings Playbook,” and “American Hustle” all got showered with Oscar nominations. “Joy” in 2015 not so much, but it still got Jennifer Lawrence another Oscar nomination. But he hasn’t done a movie since “Joy,” so this is kinda a big deal, even though we don’t have a title or a premise yet. But it is a movie starring everyone in Hollywood, which is also often the case with David O. Russell movies. This one brings in Anya Taylor-Joy, Margot Robbie, Timothy Olyphant, Christian Bale, Zoe Saldana, Robert De Niro, Rami Malek, Michael Shannon, John David Washington, Mike Meyers, Chris Rock, and even Taylor Swift. So how about that for a movie cast? Sounds like “American Hustle” to me, which I was not a fan of. Once I know more about what this is, I’ll decide how excited I am.

Violent NightDecember 2

A Christmas-themed action film whose title made me laugh, so I had to put it on. It’s probably going to be a bad movie and not make much of an impact at the box office, but so be it. It stars David Harbour and is produced by David Leitch, although not directed. I talked about him up in the “Bullet Train” segment of this post.

P31December 21

OK, so I have no idea what this really is, but I was highly amused by it. It’s a musical adaptation of Psalms 31, which is the Psalm that talks about a virtuous woman being more precious than rubies. And for the life of me I couldn’t figure out if this is a Christmas musical that I should be excited about or a worldly musical that uses Christian imagery that I should be worried about. And the director is a guy who directed a 2017 movie called “The Jesus Freak,” a movie I’d never heard of about Christians going to Las Vegas with the intent on converting people, but get quickly tempted. So that didn’t help me out. And I don’t know if this is even going to be big enough to be a thing that is actually a thing or is a small movie released in just a few random theaters. I guess I’ll know more about this mystery when December rolls around.

I Want to Dance with SomebodyDecember 23

Another musical biopic being released this year. We have one on Elvis and another on the Bee Gees that I talked about earlier. And this is a biopic about Whitney Houston. Which definitely has a lot of potential. I don’t know why this is down in the maybe while the other two are in the good section, but I think it’s more because this release is further out the director, Kasi Lemmons, is more of an unproven filmmaker. “Harriet” was her last film and that was supposed to be a big Oscar film, but got met with very mixed results. She also did “Black Nativity” in 2013, which again had mixed reviews. But if she can pull this off, I could see this positioned as a big Oscar film. It has a better release date than Elvis and the Bee Gees as far as Oscars go.

Night at the Museum: Kahmunrah RisesTBD 2022 (Disney+)

I guess this is the year where Disney brings back all of their old franchises to give them another sequel. I suppose the last “Night at the Museum” was in 2014, so not as old as “Enchanted” or “Hocus Pocus.” But hey, I enjoyed the Night at the Museum movies. Give me a decent sequel and I’ll fire up my Disney+ for it. I’ll admit that “Kahmunrah Rises” is a great subtitle.

Peter Pan & WendyTBD 2022 (Disney+)

I’m not as negative on this as I am a bit Grinchy on getting two Pinocchio movies in one year. “Peter Pan & Wendy” is directed by David Lowery, who directed the “Pete’s Dragon” remake, which was really good. So I have faith in him. It’s just that we have so many Peter Pan movies that I’m wondering if we really need another one. And if we do, what’s the new take that they’re bringing to the table. The fact that Wendy gets a spot in the title makes me think that their relationship gets more of a focus, but looking at the cast, which is fairly impressive, makes it look like a traditional Peter Pan. So I don’t know. It’s a Disney+ release, so whenever Disney decides to put this one out, I’ll be curious enough to check it out.

All Quiet on the Western Front TBD 2022 (Netflix)

And to finish this list off, we have a remake of the 1930 best picture winner. Or, rather, another adaptation of the 1929 novel by Erich Maria Remarque. In thinking about this, this is a novel and a movie that it kinda makes sense to do another adaptation of. But all that Hollywood has ever done is the original movie and a 1979 TV film. So as I’ve thought about it, I think it could work. It’s just that it’s directed by a German director named Edward Berger who I’ve never heard of, so I don’t know what to think. It will be filmed in German and it does star Daniel Bruhl, so that’s cool on both fronts. But also with it being a Netflix release, I don’t know if it’s going to be a major awards player that Netflix will make a big push for or if it’s something that will quietly be released without much noise. TBD, I suppose, just like its release date.

Wednesday, January 26, 2022

The Matrix: Franchise Review (Original, Reloaded, Revolutions, Resurrections)

Here’s a unique review for you. Instead of one review of the latest entry in The Matrix franchise, I’m here to deliver you a review of the entire franchise as a whole. No, this isn’t going to be four detailed reviews of each film. While this post is long, given that I’m talking about an entire franchise, I’ve decided to pick and choose which points to highlight. Strong emphasis on the original film and a decent-sized conversation about this most recent one, but the main goal here is to highlight why the first one worked so well and compare those notes to the sequels that have come after it rather than give a detailed dive into each of the four movies.

Because here’s the thing. I had not seen any of the Matrix sequels until last week. I saw the original not too long before it came out. Not in theaters because I was only 10 when it was released, but I remember watching it on TV at my friends place at some point in the early 2000s, probably around sixth or seventh grade, give or take. But I never got around to watching the other two after they were released. I was more of a casual movie fan until I moved out for college, so some of those 2000s movies and earlier escaped me, especially ones liked the Matrix sequels that everyone seemed to hate. Catching up just wasn’t high on my priority list.

But nevertheless, one cannot watch and review a fourth movie in a franchise without having seen the previous three. I was going to get caught up before “Resurrections” was released in theaters and on HBO Max on Christmas. But I failed. Yet I made the commitment to watch all four before “Resurrections” left HBO Max, which was on my birthday, January 21. With literally minutes to go before it disappeared, my task was complete. And thus being in a Matrix mood, all of thoughts on the four movies have been swirling around in my head and need to escape, not just thoughts on the final one. So this is why I am approaching this review in this way.

Before I completely bury my lede here, I will say that none of the Matrix sequels live up to the original film. In fact, they get progressively worse. This latest iteration especially feels useless and overly convoluted. They spend the whole movie trying to justify this new movie’s existence. And it seems quite evident based on scenes in the movie itself that Lana Wachowski had no desire to even make this film, but she was forced into a corner by Warner Bros. themselves, who were going to make a sequel with or without her. So she uninspiringly threw one together and the result is a really ugly mess that was also a massive failure at the box office.

But to fully understand exactly why this one was a mess, there needs to be an understanding of what exactly made the first movie succeed and why none of the sequels were able to recapture that magic that the first movie presented.

"The Matrix"
I found it a rather immersive experience diving into that original film again. With the benefit of hindsight, the plot itself is nothing remarkable. We’ve seen many times, before and after 1999, the story of humans versus artificial intelligence. As technology continues to evolve, there seems to be a consistent, overarching fear that one day the technology is going to get more advanced than humans can handle and completely take over. And that fear is often reflected by authors and filmmakers in various media, including books, TV shows, and movies. Even back in 1999, “The Matrix” had its own inspirations, like the 1995 anime “The Ghost in the Shell.” And when it comes to humans vs. artificial intelligence, a lot of inspirations can perhaps be traced back to 1982’s “Blade Runner.” Fast forward 23 years and this particular niche has been oversaturated to the extreme.

But even with that, what makes “The Matrix” so immersive is how they set up the world. There is a well-executed balanced between the world building and the stylized action. The audience is essentially put in the shoes of Neo, our main character, who feels like a normal human being living a normal life until suddenly a lot of trippy things start happening. He learns that the world he knows is essentially fake, a virtual creation of the artificial intelligence, who have almost completely wiped out the human race. They’ve kept humanity in these little pods that inject the virtual world into their minds while their real bodies are rotting on the side of a cliff. Neo learns about all this while also getting the bombshell that he is to be the “Chosen One,” to save the remaining or escaped humans from the machines.

When I re-watched “The Matrix” last week, I actually watched it twice. Sure, some of the superfans probably know it like the back of their hands, but having not watched it in years, there’s a whole lot of lore that they throw you into. It’s a lot to take in at first and thus you feel for Neo as he’s trying to figure out what exactly is going on and what exactly he’s supposed to do. But as everything connects in the end, it’s really a fun experience going through it again and having all of those final dots be connected. It’s not just a bunch of fun action sequences, but it is an absolutely fascinating world. And the way in which they slowly layer everything upon itself is incredibly well put together. As Neo learns about all this, he becomes smarter and stronger, meaning the action sequences mixed in get progressively better and more entertaining. And there is a level of intensity and fear with those action sequences with all the uncertainty revolving around them. It’s one thing to watch people punch, kick, and shoot at each other. It’s another to not know how things are going to resolve. If you fear for your protagonist’s safety, you become a lot more emotionally invested in the sequences.

And speaking of the action sequences, what “The Matrix” is best known for is that stylized action. Given the setup of this virtual world, the typical laws of the universe don’t exactly apply like they would in the normal universe. So as our Chosen One learns more of his abilities, he also learns how to defy the laws of physics, adding a new layer to the action. And on top of that, the slow motion work along with those physics-defying sequences made this a milestone event in the world of action and sci-fi. To the point where it was copied and parodied just about everywhere and became a bit stale. Yet the original movie never ceased to be entertaining.

"The Matrix Reloaded"
Yes, I said that this review was not going to be a detailed synopsis of all of the four movies, but detailing the first one feels very important here to establishing why the sequels never lived up. These elements that I brought up here that make “The Matrix” so great aren’t followed like they should. There’s a formula that the Wachowskis laid out for themselves in the first movie that they were never able to go back and follow, whether or not they were invested in doing so. And that ultimately is why the sequels are disappointing. “The Matrix” can stand on its own as a singular film, but Neo doesn’t save the world in that first movie. He gets to the point where he now has the ability to do so, and promises the enemies that he is going to defeat them, but there is a cliffhanger there that sets up for a grand and beautiful franchise that ultimately is never realized. So much potential that is completely wasted.

Now I don’t want to come in and jump on the bandwagon of hate as if I’m morally obligated as a movie fan to do so. I know people who have really loved all three movies. And I also know that some fan reaction is very black and white. If a movie is not the epic masterpiece that you wanted it to be, people often unfairly discard it as trash. See any of the Star Wars sequels. None of the recent movies are the worst movie in the world, but sometimes when you care about a franchise so much, “average” and “decent” are not acceptable. The disappointment turns into hatred because your expectations were so high. “The Matrix Reloaded” still has the fifth highest opening weekend ever for an R-rated movie. And it held the record of highest R-rated opener for 13 years until “Deadpool” came around in 2016. Fans were massively excited for it, yet were massively disappointed. Were they justified in their hate or were they being unfair?

Obviously you know my answer to that question now, but that’s an honest question that I had going into the sequels. I wasn’t just falling in line to what I was supposed to think. I genuinely thought it was possible that I would enjoy the sequels given that I don’t have the same level of superfandom attached to “The Matrix.” And my expectations going in were different. If you expect to get disappointed, then you can’t get disappointed, right?

And honestly “Reloaded” isn’t that bad. It obviously had big shoes to follow. And while it didn’t manage to be an “Empire Strikes Back,” a sequel to an iconic, groundbreaking film that somehow managed to be better than the first, you can tell that the Wachowskis really tried hard to up the ante and make this a bigger and better film. To which I give a tip of the hat for an honest effort.

The ultimate issues lie in the topic of balance. And I made such a big effort in speaking of “The Matrix” being a well-balanced and properly layered film because, in my opinion, that’s where “Reloaded” falls flat on its face. All four Matrix films overload you with exposition. And exposition is not an inherently bad thing as some people make it out to be. But “The Matrix” balanced that exposition in a way that made you progressively learn about this world along with the main character. “Reloaded” gives you immensely heavy exposition dumps squeezed into small periods of film time. And in between those immensely heavy exposition dumps are action sequences that are the biggest and longest action sequences that you might find in any action film, which can be both a positive and a negative.

Yes, the 17-minute care chase sequence might be the most entertaining car chase sequence you’ve ever watched. Yes, the scene in the playground at the beginning with Neo and the hundreds of Agent Smiths is an absolutely insane fight. And yes, the staircase sequence with Neo vs. the French guy and all of his cronies is fantastic. But I think it’s quite possible that they were a bit too much. It was a bit action heavy and minimal on plot. Minimal, yet dense, as I described. The Wachowskis could’ve spread the exposition out more cleverly across the film in doses that were easy to take. In doing so, cut down some of those action sequences to make a better balanced film. And if you tell me that’s preposterous and you don’t want the car chase any shorter, then might I remind you that “The Matrix” wasn’t an action-heavy film. The action sequences were spread out and well executed. The focus was on quality action, not quantity of action. And that’s why it worked so well.

The other part of the action sequences that I noticed is that the stakes weren’t as high. That’s also why I mentioned in my summary of the first film that you can become a lot more invested in a movie if you fear for the life of your protagonist or the opponent seems too strong to overcome. Because in “Reloaded” Neo has essentially reached God status. In more context than one. I think him coming to Zion and having a large crowd of people on their knees begging for his help was a bit heavy-handed. It was as if he was literally their Jesus Christ. But outside that, in the context of action sequences, he’s basically Superman. He can fly, he can easily fight off any opponent in hand-to-hand combat, and he can’t miss any target with his gun. And he can also make any bullets drop in midair. And when your opponent is this invincible, the reward isn’t as high when he wins. Despite the action being incredibly well put together, it becomes like the lightsaber fights in the Star Wars prequels, also released around this time. It’s basically like choreographed dances and not fights. And that’s not as intense in comparison.

In short, bigger doesn’t equal better. I think the Wachowskis’ main problem is that they tried to go too big instead of building on the incredible mythology. It also suffers from being only half of a movie, because they literally filmed the two sequels back-to-back and release them in the same year. In current time, that’s not a huge problem. You can jump straight to the next one on HBO Max and treat it like one giant, five-hour movie (267 minutes total). But I think it would’ve been more rewarding if they focused on making one individually good movie because on its own it’s just a bunch of massive action sequences strung together  with a partial plot.

That said, if you want to treat it like one massive Matrix sequel, that makes it… worse.

"The Matrix Revolutions"
Because “The Matrix Revolutions” is a giant mess. I can concede that “Reloaded” is very watchable and entertaining. And maybe that’s a higher opinion of it than some people have. But I was not invested in “Revolutions” at all.

I don’t really care to do a massive deep dive into all of the problems of “Revolutions,” but the biggest issue for me is that it becomes a massive video game. The type of video game that I don’t really care for. I know gunplay is a thing in every Matrix movie, but it was stylized gunplay that mixed very well with its martial arts hand-to-hand combat. The whole middle section of “Revolutions” had no stylized action at all. It was a massive battle with all the machines invading Zion and the defenders of Zion endlessly shooting their machine guns at them. And in most of these middle sequences, Neo is not involved. He went off on another quest that we finish the movie with. I’ll get to that in a second, but a Neo-less Matrix movie without the stylized action sequences and a bunch of new characters that I definitely don’t care about is not the sci-fi wonder that I wanted. This felt like a Michael Bay action film and not a brilliant sci-fi movie. In “Reloaded,” they tried to include elements of the first movie, they just had it mostly imbalanced. In “Revolutions,” just about everything that made “The Matrix” work was disregarded. And that was rather mind-boggling to me.

The sole interesting part of the movie that felt like a Matrix movie was the final act of the movie where Neo arrives at Machine City. And when your only good moment is the final act, that’s a problem. I can pick apart “Reloaded” pretty easily, but at least it kept me entertained for all three acts. The only good action sequence in this movie is when Neo gets plugged into the Matrix again at the end and has his final confrontation with Agent Smith. And to that scene’s credit, it’s incredible. But one good scene at the end is not nearly enough to make up for the fact that the rest of the movie was a massive dumpster fire.

But even with that one really good sequence, I had many questions about the resolution of the film. I don’t want to do a deep dive into all my questions, and spoiler alert for the movie if you’re like me and hadn’t seen it yet are wanting to, but here’s some quick highlights of my confusion. Trinity dies pretty unceremoniously. They crash landed into Machine City and that killed her. Granted, I think there are parts of all four movies that focused way too much on that romance, but it’s still a bit anticlimactic the way they wrote her off. But a bigger bullet point is how Neo so easily made peace with the Machines. He basically just went in and asked them if they could have peace and they agreed? 200 years of fighting these things and all they had to do was kindly ask them to not fight? That’s weird. And final point, while the Agent Smith fight was really good, I’m a bit confused as to how it actually ended. He let Agent Smith take him over and then all the Agent Smiths exploded. Maybe that one is explainable, but it still left me puzzled. And I think that there could’ve been a better resolution.

So anyways, Neo is dead. We think. Trinity is dead. But the Agent Smiths went boom and Neo asked for peace, so peace we have and a conclusion we have been led to. Maybe. Because it still ended in a slightly ambiguous way with the Oracle’s conversation with the Architect. Maybe Neo is gone for good? Maybe he’ll come back? Maybe the peace will remain or maybe the Machines will decide to change their mind and go to war again?

I don’t think it was a very satisfactory ended, but it needs to be emphasized that it was still an ending. An ending in which the Wachowskis never intended on coming back to. And I do believe they said that in interviews. Matrix 4 was never in the plans for them.

"The Matrix Resurrections"
Which awkwardly leads us to this new movie, “Matrix Resurrections.” And, oh boy, if I thought “Revolutions” was a dumpster fire, I was in for one in “Resurrections.” Even though I hadn’t seen the previous two Matrix movies in this franchise, I will be honest and say that I never was excited for this movie. I know a lot of people that were super hyped. And I know a lot of people that watched the trailer and were blown away. While I admit that “White Rabbit” by Jefferson Airplane was a perfect song choice for the trailer, the trailer never excited me. It never looked good. It never looked interesting. It’s just a thing that existed. My analysis was that Warner Bros. saw the major Keanaissance take place with how massively popular Keanu Reeves has become since the John Wick movies and decided that they were going to make another Matrix movie. Studios reviving old franchises is becoming a very trendy thing today in the wake of the Disney Star Wars era and others. And it can work. But if a studio decides to mandate a franchise revival from filmmakers who never wanted that franchise to be revived, that’s a big issue.

And when push comes to shove, that’s all that “Resurrections” feels like. As it turns out, both Neo and Trinity are alive and living normal lives in a revived or rebooted version of the Matrix. But not just that, Neo works as a video game creator. He’s made three video games called “The Matrix” and now Warner Bros. is forcing him to make a new Matrix video game. And there is an extensive discussion in their office about the necessity of making another Matrix game and all the implications of a reboot or a sequel to this.

Look, maybe some people liked how Meta that was. But for me, I was like… what? And it’s not just subtle or slightly referential. This is all-out Deadpool making fun of Fox and pop culture inside of his movie. And for Deadpool it works. That’s the point of Deadpool. But turning The Matrix into Deadpool did not feel like it fit in anywhere. It felt like Warner Bros. approached Lana Wachowski and said, you’re making this movie or someone else is. So forced into a corner, she wrote a Matrix movie. And she decided to spend the first act of the movie calling out Warner Bros. on their absurdity inside of her film. And somehow that screenplay with all of that in it got the green light from Warner Bros., which is both hilarious and mind-boggling.

In hindsight, this is not the first 2021 Warner Bros. movie to make full Warner Bros. meta references. That was all of “Space Jam: A New Legacy.” Also in hindsight, maybe Warner Bros. should’ve asked someone different than the Wachowskis. Granted, I will admit that I need to go revisit "Speed Racer” and “Cloud Atlas,” but this sibling duo is fully responsible for “Jupiter Ascending,” one of the worst movies ever. And, as I’ve pointed out in detail, they didn’t seem to fully understand what it was about their original Matrix movie that made it work so well. And if they did, they didn’t execute well. So in my opinion, the Wachowskis are not good filmmakers. They made one great movie, “The Matrix,” and a lot of trash ever since. So this sequel just seemed like a project doomed to fail. A studio mandated sequel from poor filmmakers who didn’t seem interested in making this in the first place.

That’s all that really needs to be said, but outside the confusing meta sequence with The Matrix being a video game franchise that Neo programmed, this is the longest Matrix movie at 2 hours 28 minutes and the movie spends approximately the first two hours trying to justify its existence and never succeeding. It’s two hours of massive exposition dump and a plot that mostly revolves around Neo trying to save Trinity from the Matrix. Because once he’s gotten out, he now tries to figure out how to convince her to escape when her new Matrix life is being happily married (to someone who isn’t Neo) with kids. Add to that a whole slew of new characters that are even more uninteresting that the ones they introduced in “Revolutions.” There’s also a recast Morpheus that is kinda in the movie and a few useless cameos, most notably the Frenchman from “Reloaded,” who is only there for the most useless moment of nostalgia vomit, not even getting two minutes of screen time.

And don’t ask me how Neo and Trinity are now alive. I guess the Machines just decided that they needed to be alive and in a pod again. Which totally undermines anything from the trilogy itself, given that we now know that the stakes are even lower. If you die, you can just be brought back. So there’s not even a fear of death.

There is only one action sequence that is even remotely entertaining. And it comes at the two hour mark. And even then, it’s a slightly forgettable action sequence in comparison to other action sequences that we’ve had in recent movies. I didn’t expect the movie to revolutionize the action genre like the first movie, or be any sort of milestone in filmmaking, but I was hoping for some action sequences that at least felt close to the John Wick movies, given that I theorize that’s why this movie exists, or at least be somewhat reminiscent of the original Matrix movie. At the very least, give me a big, fun action sequence like that in “Reloaded.” Nope. Whatever expectation there was for at least a minor moment of entertainment never panned out.

The only solace I gain from this whole debauchery was that it was a massive failure at the box office. It opened to $10.7 million at the domestic box office and has made $36.7 million domestically at the point of me typing this up. For context, the previous three movies opened to $27.8 million, $91.8 million, and $48.5 million, respectively. Adjusted for ticket price inflation, given that was 1999 and 2003, that is the current equivalent of $50.1 million, $139.4 million, and $73.6 million. Their final domestic totals were $173.9 million, $281.6 million, and $139.3 million, which again translate to $313.7 million, $427.7 million, and $211.6 million. To follow that up with a $10 million opening perhaps a final total that reaches $50 million domestically is nothing but an absolute disaster. And its worldwide total ($148.6 million right now) hasn’t even yet matched its production budget ($190 million). And usually you need to make two to three times your production budget to get a profit.

There’s no way around it. “Resurrections” failed to resurrect the franchise at the box office. Some watched on HBO Max (myself included), but I promise that didn’t make up the difference. I don’t even need numbers to know that. And COVID isn’t really an excuse given that “Spider-Man: Now Way” just made $1.7 billion worldwide so far. What this really means is that we’re not getting a fifth Matrix movie. The Wachowskis don’t want to do it and there’s no way Warner Bros. can justify a sequel with that financial output, not to mention that the majority of fans seem to also hate it. I can, with confidence, say that the Matrix franchise is now over. To which I unfortunately say…

Good.

We can safely pretend that the first movie is the only one that happened and that the rest never existed. That’s probably how it should’ve been, which is unfortunate given how much potential there was to keep going. If only someone competent was in charge.

Friday, January 7, 2022

Movie Preview: January 2022


Another year has come and gone. As such, it’s time to preview the year in film that is before us, which is something that I did not do last year. The state of the box office was still at a point where I had no idea what was going to come out, so there didn’t seem to be much of a point in my yearly preview. While things are still very fluid and in a state of recovery, I feel confident enough in the state of the industry to bring that post back.

Obviously this is not that post, but given that we’re in the new year, I wanted to let you know what the plan is. Every year that I do that post, it’s always a challenge to figure out how to balance the January preview as well. This year the January preview is coming first.

Granted, there’s not much to preview this January. Even before COVID, January was always a weird month. The box office would always be dominated by holiday holdovers and awards hopefuls expanding, while the new releases felt like movies that were just kinda dumped on the schedule given that January is not typically the optimal month to release something new. Add the Omicron concerns into all that and we have a pretty barren landscape. Now “Spider-Man: No Way Home” proved that people are still willing to go to the theaters if it’s for a movie they’re excited about. That movie has now made $1.4 billion worldwide, without a China release, in the midst of massively rising COVID cases. So that provides studios with plenty of confidence. Yet the movies that are in trouble with Omicron are the releases that people maybe weren’t so excited about. The typical January release. Sure, they’ll brave the storm for Spider-Man? But for a movie they weren’t so excited about? Not so much.

That’s a bit of a longer intro than I normally do. But given the circumstances and the lack of movies in this post, I felt it was a necessary. There’s not much to type in the body of this post, so perhaps I’m making up for it here? Anyways, let’s jump in. As always, release date info is courtesy of the-numbers.com and boxofficepro.com. The release dates listed are the domestic release dates, so United States and Canada, and are subject to change at any point.

January 7 – 9

Universal’s "The 355"
The winner of this weekend running away will be “Spider-Man: No Way Home” for a fourth straight weekend. As of Wednesday, the 5th, it has made $631.8 million domestically, good enough for eighth place on the list of highest grossing movies at the domestic box office. It just recently passed “Incredibles 2” ($608.6 million), “Star Wars: The Last Jedi” ($620.2 million), and “The Avengers” ($623.4 million). Next up are “Jurassic World” ($652.3 million) and “Titanic” ($659.4 million). It can pass both of those movies with $27.6 million from Thursday through Sunday. Box Office Pro is currently projecting $27.5 million on the 3-day alone, with a $663.3 million by the end of Sunday. And that’s with a projected 51 percent drop.

The only new release in the market that is hoping to break the top 5 is Universal’s new action thriller The 355. Actually, Universal is probably hoping for a lot more than just a total that sneaks into the top 5, but they might have to live with that. Box Office Pro is projecting this at just $3 million, enough to barely get it to third place, above “The King’s Man,” “American Underdog,” and “Matrix Resurrections,” while below the projected $12 million of “Sing 2.” On paper, “The 355” sounds like a winner. It has a huge cast of females, with Jessica Chastain, Lupita Nyong’o, Diane Kruger, Penelope Cruz, and Fan Bingbing all portraying female intelligent agents from different countries – United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Colombia, and China – teaming up together to stop a terrorist group from starting World War III. Chastain actually proposed this idea of a female-led spy thriller to Simon Kinberg while they were making “Dark Phoenix.” And thus this movie’s production began, with Kinberg here as the director and Chastain as one of the stars.

The ultimate challenge for “The 355” is making it stand out. The advertising has heavily pushed the Bourne connection with universal and they’re trying to make it the next big spy franchise. But there are a lot of these that have come out over the years. And unfortunately it may seem like one of the many generic Netflix action movies that have come out over the years, perhaps leading people to wait till whenever it hits a streaming service before they see it instead of rushing out to theaters. Hence the projected $3 million opening. The early critical score of 23 percent on Rotten Tomatoes with 77 reviews counted certainly won’t help things.

January 14 – 16

Paramount's "Scream"
While “The 355” is most definitely not going to dethrone Spider-Man at the top of the box office, the biggest challenger to Spider-Man this month comes here in the second weekend of January and that is the release of Scream. For what it’s worth, the one genre that has been able to consistently succeed in the month of January is the horror genre. Even low quality horror movies with terrible reviews have often been able to attract enough audiences to make back their budget. And “Scream” is the fifth movie in a very popular horror franchise that hasn’t had a theatrically-released film since 2011. This could definitely work in its favor. And although “Scream 4” had diminished returns compared to the first three, “Scream” is attempting to go the “Halloween” route by releasing a soft reboot/sequel to the original with the original cast and an identical name to the original. The strategy worked like a charm for “Halloween,” to the tune of one of the highest opening weekends ever for a horror movie. It remains to be seen if lightning can strike twice here with another horror franchise. “Scream 3” holds the biggest opening weekend with $34.7 million.

A $30 million opening weekend would definitely be a huge win for the franchise, especially since the bar is low for financial success with horror movies having much lower budgets than normal films. That’s why there’s still been a consistent stream of horror movies released throughout the entire pandemic. They don’t need to make a lot. Since there’s no other wide releases this weekend, I’ll quickly point out that “Scream 4” opened to $18.7 million. And while “Scream 3” holds the franchise record for opening weekend, when you adjust for ticket price inflation, “Scream 2” passes it up for a 2022 equivalent of $65.7 million (The unadjusted total for “Scream 2” is $32.9 million). Worst case scenario for “Scream” seems to be a $10-15 million opening, unless it completely bombs. A total in that range could theoretically still beat Spider-Man, but that would make for an awfully close race if that’s the case. And this is a holiday weekend, with Martin Luther King Jr. Day coming on Monday, so there could be good holds.

January 21 – 23

Universal’s "Redeeming Love"
There may or may not be two new wide releases coming to theaters in the third weekend of January. And by that I mean that the release schedule has two movies scheduled for wide release, but looking at the two movies, I’m not so sure how wide either of them will end up being. If I were to make a bet, I would say that the movie most likely to do well and/or be the widest new release is Redeeming Love. Mainly because it’s being distributed by Universal. And because the trailer on YouTube has 1.7 million views, compared to the other movie’s trailer having 201,000 views. You might be able to guess that “Redeeming Love” is a romance movie. And you’d be right. But it’s also a historical film. It’s a romance set in the 1850s during the Gold Rush, where the lead female has had a very bad history of abuse, so the idea of loving and trusting someone is difficult for her. It’s based on a best-selling novel by Francine Rivers. Those factors could all be in the movie’s favor as an early Valentine’s Day date option, even if the director or lead stars aren’t anyone too notable.

The other movie theoretically scheduled for release is The King’s Daughter, not to be confused with “The King’s Man” from last month. This is a real movie that’s coming out and it even has a trailer released, with a decent number of views, as just pointed out. The question here comes with the fact that the distributer is Gravitas Ventures and they’ve only released one movie that has made over $1 million in its entire run. And that’s a movie called “Queen Bees” from last year. It started in 500 theaters and finished with $1.6 million after an opening weekend of $375,000. Looking at those numbers, that feels about what “The King’s Daughter” will do. Although in its favor is a cast that’s led by Pierce Brosnan and William Hurt. The premise might throw you for a loop, though. It’s about King Louis XIV’s quest for immortality leading him to capture and steal the life force of a mermaid, whom his daughter discovered. Whether that makes you more or less likely to see it is for you to decide. It’s also notable that this is a movie that was filmed way back in 2014, so it’s been on the shelf for a very long time.

January 28 – 30

And that’s it. At the time of me typing this, there are no releases scheduled for the final weekend of January. So yeah, January is currently just “The 355” and “Scream,” with those two smaller films coming in the third weekend.

If you’re curious as to why this weekend is completely empty, Sony’s “Morbius” was previously slated for this dated. In light of Omicron, Sony pushed that movie to April, in hopes of Omicron having died down a bit. Also, there was supposed to be a “Sesame Street” movie on January 14 by Warner Bros., but they temporarily took that off the schedule, presumably waiting until cases die down before putting back on the schedule.

Also, the movie “Cyrano” might eventually come out at some point. That’s a new musical starring Peter Dinklage that has been getting a lot of critical praise. It had its Oscar-qualifying run in December and has also had screeners given out to critics and awards voters. But as far as its release to general audiences, it was initially scheduled for a limited release at the end of December and an expansion in January, but United Artists has changed their plans on that a few times. It’s currently scheduled for a limited release on this final weekend, but that could also be up in the air. This is the type of release where it might be most beneficial to wait a bit until Omicron dies down. Smaller releases have the biggest chance of being ignored. Or they might be waiting for Oscar nominations to come out, which is early February, with the hopes that Peter Dinklage gets a nomination, or it getting something in some category, then using that to gain interest. But despite the critical buzz being very high, the awards buzz seems very quiet. But whenever “Cyrano” comes out, I’ll give an update.