Sunday, March 27, 2022

The 94th Academy Awards: Predictions


The Oscars are tonight, so it’s definitely time for my annual Oscar post. I was going to get this out earlier in the week, but I got busy, then spent all of Saturday watching the shorts and typing this post. It took longer than I thought. So it’s here on day of the Oscars instead of day before. Oh well. The purpose of this post is twofold. One, I predict who is going to win each award. Two, I give you might thoughts on who I think deserves to win. This is simply just for fun. If I’m right, I’m right. If I’m wrong, then it’s OK. You can look at this and see what I was expecting. If my score ends up being horrible, that just means it was an eventful, surprising evening. And that can be exciting, depending, of course, on what the surprises were. And yes, we’re going through all 23 categories, even the ones that some, including the Oscars themselves, don’t seem to care about. I make that note because the Oscars are deciding this year not to present every award live, which is really frustrating to all of us who enjoy watching the Oscars. But it is what it is. Anyways, wish me luck on my picks, and, most importantly, I hope this post will inspire you to check out some of these movies!
 

Documentary (Short Subject):

Nominations:

- “Audible” - Matt Ogens and Geoff McLean
- “Lead Me Home” - Pedros Kos and Jon Shenk
- “The Queen of Basketball” - Ben Proudfoot
- “Three Songs for Benzair” - Elizabeth Mirzaei and Gulistan Mirzaei
- “When We Were Bullies” - Jay Rosenblatt 

Will Win 

- “Lead Me Home” - Pedros Kos and Jon Shenk

Should Win:

- “The Queen of Basketball” - Ben Proudfoot 

And we start with the shorts. These are actually some of my favorite categories. And the ones I’m pretty sure no one else in my circle watches, despite me always trying to convince people to check them out. So if you want to be a part of the cool club, hunt these down and give them a watch. It won’t take too much of your time. “Audible, “Lead Me Home,” and “Three Songs for Benzair” are all on Netflix. “The Queen of Basketball” is on the New York Times’ YouTube channel as one of their Op-Docs. “When We Were Bullies” is coming to HBO Max… on March 30. So it’s the one that I haven’t yet seen.

Now predicting which one is going to win is literally a shot in the dark. For some reason, I’m thinking one of the three Netflix documentaries has the best chance. And my gut tells me that “Lead Me Home,” which is about the homeless situation in Los Angeles, might connect most with voters? For me personally, “The Queen of Basketball” makes the best use of its time and is a delightful interview and story with the only woman drafted into the NBA. She didn’t join the team, but it’s still really cool that she was drafted. And I had no idea of her story prior to this. The others are great subjects, but could’ve been longer. “Audible” tries to stuff too much into 30 minutes, while “Lead Me Home” and “Three Songs for Benzair” didn’t seem to have enough content to put together a compelling narrative. More work and more footage could’ve helped them, in my opinion 

Short Film (Animated):

Nominations:

- “Affairs of the Art” - Joanna Quinn and Les Mills
- “Bestia” - Hugo Covarrubias and Tevo Díaz
- “Boxballet” - Anton Dyakov
- “Robin Robin” - Dan Ojari and Mikey Please
- “The Windshield Wiper” - Alberto Mielgo and Leo Sanchez 

Will Win:

- “Robin Robin” - Dan Ojari and Mikey Please

Should Win:

- “Robin Robin” - Dan Ojari and Mikey Pleas 

This one’s gotta be “Robin Robin,” right? This is an Aardman short on Netflix. And Aardman is a studio that just doesn’t miss when it comes to quality animation, this cute 30-minute short about a robin raised by mice is one you’ve gotta watch, regardless of what actually wins this. Normally this is a category where Pixar and Disney do really well. But they didn’t get nominated this year, which is strange because I thought “Us Again,” which played in front of “Raya,” and “Far From the Tree,” which played in front of “Encanto,” were both really good. “Us Again” even made the short list, but missed the final five. “Bestia” and “Boxballet” have not been made available to watch, so I can’t speak on those, but “Affairs of the Art” and “The Windshield Wiper” are both on YouTube and are really bonkers. And I’m not so sure I mean that in a good way this time around. So yeah, “Robin Robin” is easily the best of the three that I’ve seen. And also one that just feels like will take home this Oscar. 

Short Film (Live Action):

Nominations:

- “Ala Kachuu - Take and Run” - Maria Brendle and Nadine Lüchinger
- “The Dress” - Tadeusz Łysiak and Maciej Śleskicki
- “The Long Goodbye” - Aneil Karia and Riz Ahmed
- “On My Mind” - Martin Strange-Hansen and Kim Magnusson
- “Please Hold” - K.D. Dávila and Levin Menekse 

Will Win: 

- “The Long Goodbye” - Aneil Karia and Riz Ahmed

Should Win:

- “Please Hold” - K.D. Dávila and Levin Menekse 

Man, do they ever nominate happy films in this category? I’ll have to look back on my posts from previous years, but I feel like I’m always surprised by how dark and dreary these live action shorts are. And outside “Ala Kachuu,” they’re all available to be watched. “Please Hold” and “The Dress” are on HBO Max, while “The Long Goodbye” and “On My Mind” are on YouTube. Again, anything could win in this category, but this kinda does feel like the tea leaves are favoring “The Long Goodbye.” This is Riz Ahmed. He was deserving of a win in last year’s Oscars for “Sound of Metal,” he just happened to go up against Anthony Hopkins and Chadwick Boseman, so this could be the Academy’s chance to give him an Oscar, as he stars in and is a producer of this short. Plus this is a very politically charged short, which is the exact thing that won this last year. It’s not bad, but it’s definitely heavy on the shock value for me. “The Dress” and “On My Mind” are both very nice films, but are a tad bit depressing. “Please Hold” isn’t exactly a happy film either, but it reminded me of a “Black Mirror” episode, so I gravitated towards it the most. “Ala Kachuu” looked very good and very intense based on the trailer I watched, but again it’s not available to be watched at the moment.

International Feature Film:

Nominations:

- “Drive My Car” - Japan
- “Flee” - Denmark
- “The Hand of God” - Italy
- “Lunana: A Yak in the Classroom” - Bhutan
- “The Worst Person in the World” - Norway 

Will Win:

- “Drive My Car” - Japan

Should Win:

- “Drive My Car” - Japan

This might be the easiest prediction of the night. If someone had a gun at your head and said you have to get a prediction right or else the trigger will be pulled, this is the one you tell them. “Drive My Car” got a best picture, a best director, and a best adapted screenplay nomination. It’s not losing this category. “The Worst Person in the World” would be the shocking upset because it also got a screenplay nod, but it’s not going to happen. Although I wouldn’t be upset if it did. “The Worst Person in the World” is a really good film. I was very surprised by it. But “Drive My Car” is the best of the category. And surprisingly, almost all of them are available to be watched. “Drive My Car” is on HBO Max. “Flee” is on Hulu. “The Hand of God” is on Netflix. “The Worst Person in the World” is in theaters. “Lunana: A Yak in the Classroom” is the only one that’s not available, although that title makes me very curious to watch it. Of note, “Flee” is triple nominated in animated feature, international film, and documentary, so that gives it points, but if they decide to reward it, it won’t be in this category.

Documentary (Feature):

Nominations:

- “Ascension” - Jessica Kingdon, Kira Simon-Kennedy and Nathan Truesdell
- “Attica” - Stanley Nelson and Traci A. Curry
- “Flee” - Jonas Poher Rasmussen, Monica Hellström, Singe Byrge Sørensen and Charlotte De La Gournerie
- “Summer of Soul (…or, When the Revolution Could Not Be Televised)” - Ahmir "Questlove" Thompson, Joseph Patel, Rovert Fyvolent and David Dinerstein
- “Writing With Fire” - Rintu Thomas and Sushmit Ghosh 

Will Win:

- “Summer of Soul (…or, When the Revolution Could Not Be Televised)” - Ahmir "Questlove" Thompson, Joseph Patel, Rovert Fyvolent and David Dinerstei 

Should Win:

- “Flee” - Jonas Poher Rasmussen, Monica Hellström, Singe Byrge Sørensen and Charlotte De La Gournerie 

Speaking of “Flee,” if it wins something, this is where it would get the win. As said in the previous section, it’s a triple nominee. It’s a foreign language documentary where much of the footage is animated. It’s the story of a refugee fleeing the Taliban’s Afghanistan. They did animated footage of his experiences while he tells his story, so it’s a very unique documentary and a very powerful one at that. I would give it the win if it were up to. “Summer of Soul” is really good, too. It’s a documentary about the 1969 Harlem Cultural Festival. Although if I’m being picky, it’s more of a feat of editing. They found a bunch of never seen footage of this festival and edited it together into a documentary. So on that technicality, I’d give the win to “Flee,” but I do think “Summer of Soul” has more momentum right now. While I’m at it, “Attica” is a really interesting documentary about a prison riot. It’s on Amazon Prime. “Writing With Fire” debuts on PBS.org… on Monday. So I’ll give it a watch and update you later on what I thought. And “Ascension” is on Paramount+, which I do not have. I really love this category every year. Documentaries are always fun for me to watch!  

Music (Original Song):

Nominations 

- “Be Alive” - Beyoncé (From “King Richard”; Music and Lyrics by DIXON and Beyoncé Knowles-Carter)
- “Dos Orguitas” - Sebastián Yatra (From “Encanto”; Music and Lyrics by Lin-Manuel Miranda)
- “Down to Joy” - Van Morrison (From “Belfast”; Music and Lyrics by Van Morrison)
- “No Time to Die” - Billie Eilish (From “No Time to Die”; Music and Lyrics by Billie Eilish and Finneas O'Connell)
- “Somehow You Do” - Reba McEntire (From “Four Good Days”; Music and Lyrics by Diane Warren) 

Will Win:

- “No Time to Die” - Billie Eilish (From “No Time to Die”; Music and Lyrics by Billie Eilish and Finneas O'Connell)

Should Win:

- “No Time to Die” - Billie Eilish (From “No Time to Die”; Music and Lyrics by Billie Eilish and Finneas O'Connell) 

When “No Time to Die” the song dropped in February 2020, I was like, “Wow, Billie. Well done.” When I heard it on context of the movie nearly two years later (delayed due to COVID, of course), I was like, “DAAAAANG girl!” Because this song is absolute fire. And not only that, when I look at this category, I like to pick a song that has the most impact on the film itself. Preferably something that weaves its way through the narrative. Most of these songs are good, but are end credit songs. “Dos Orguitas” is the other that comes at a key moment of the film that I would consider. But not only does “No Time to Die” perfectly introduce the Bond movie of the same name, but the themes of the song are constantly woven into the film. As are the song’s lyrical themes. So it’s a runaway favorite on my end. I even watched that silly “Four Good Days” film that no one’s heard of just for the song, which wound up as an end credits thing. One of these days they should give Diane Warren a win. But they should stop with the courtesy nominations for her and only nominate her if she actually has a solid chance to win from a film that is a major player. And if “Dos Orguitas” were to win here, Lin-Manuel Miranda would complete his EGOT (Emmy/Grammy/Oscar/Tony), but for now he waits. Billie has been winning everything in the precursors, steamrolling her way to Oscar, which she and Finneas will put right next to their giant Grammy collection. That’s half of an EGOT for them. I think Miranda would actually win if Disney had submitted “We Don’t Talk About Bruno,” but they didn’t, so a Bond song is going to win for the third straight time.

Music (Original Score):

Nominations: 

- “Don’t Look Up” - Nicholas Britell
- “Dune” - Hans Zimmer
- “Encanto” - Germaine Franco
- “Parallel Mothers” - Alberto Iglesias
- “The Power of the Dog” - Jonny Greenwood 

Will Win:

- “Dune” - Hans Zimmer 

Should Win:

- “Dune” - Hans Zimmer 

This is the first really hard choice. Not in terms of what I want to win. That “Dune” score by Hans Zimmer is fire. One of his best, which says a lot because he’s written a lot of iconic scores. Surprisingly his only other win came from “The Lion King,” which is not what I would’ve guessed, but I think he’s due for his second Oscar. The challenge I’m having right now is that Jonny Greenwood score from “The Power of the Dog.” If this night goes very good for “The Power of the Dog,” I think this is a category where Greenwood could steal the Oscar from Zimmer. By the way, it’s also a really good score. Very heavy on the horns, which I appreciate since that’s the instrument I played in high school. The “Don’t Look Up” score is also surprisingly good on a re-listen. Very bombastic and loud, which reflects the tone of the movie. “Encanto” and “Parallel Mothers” scores are solid, too, but feel like more traditional film scores rather than something that pop out. But do you know what? I’m going to say Hans Zimmer takes this. When in doubt, predict “Dune” in the technical categories and you’ll probably be right. But I’m definitely not confident in that pick. 

Visual Effects:

Nominations:

- “Dune” - Paul Lambert, Tristan Myles, Brian Connor and Gerd Nefzer
- “Free Guy” - Swen Gillberg, Bryan Grill, Nikos Kalaitzidis and Dan Sudick
- “No Time to Die” - Charlie Noble, Joel Green, Jonathan Fawkner and Chris Corbould
- “Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings” - Christopher Townsend, Joe Farrell, Sean Noel Walker and Dan Oliver
- “Spider-Man: No Way Home” - Kelly Port, Chris Waegner, Scott Edelstein and Dan Sudick 

Will Win:

- “Dune” - Paul Lambert, Tristan Myles, Brian Connor and Gerd Nefzer 

Should Win:

- “Dune” - Paul Lambert, Tristan Myles, Brian Connor and Gerd Nefzer

Easy. “Dune” wins this one walking away. And it’s very deserved. I’m one of those weird ones who have the complaint that “Dune” is only half of a movie. And I feel like the threw me right into the fire with some very heavy lore that I drowned in. I didn’t know what was going on for 90 percent of the movie. But one thing that was not in question was that it was a visual masterpiece. An absolutely stunning work of art. And yeah, I’m very well aware that my opinions of the movie itself could change once we see the sequels, but we’ll have to wait and see officially what happens there. But nevertheless, it’ll be a very deserving winner over our other Blockbuster courtesy nominations. Which, by the way, I am one of those people who think “Spider-Man: No Way Home” deserved 5-10 nominations, including a best picture. Not because it NEEDS it for the recognition, but because we should be nominating the year’s best films, regardless of genre or box office. The fact that Marvel can only get visual effects nominations unless they’re making something culturally relevant like “Black Panther” is very insulting. Their best films deserve to dominate at the Oscars. Fight me on that. 

Sound:

Nominations:

- “Belfast” - Denise Yarde, Simon Chase, James Mather and Niv Adiri
- “Dune” - Mac Ruth, Mark Mangini, Theo Green, Dough Hemphill and Ron Bartlett
- “No time to Die” - Simon Hayes, Oliver Tarney, James Harrison, Paul Massey and Mark Taylor
- “The Power of the Dog” - Richard Flynn, Robert Mackenzie and Tara Webb
- “West Side Story” - Tod A. Maitland, Gary Rydstrom, Brian Chumney, Andy Nelson and Shawn Murphy 

Will Win:

- “Dune” - Mac Ruth, Mark Mangini, Theo Green, Dough Hemphill and Ron Bartlett 

Should Win:

- “Dune” - Mac Ruth, Mark Mangini, Theo Green, Dough Hemphill and Ron Bartlett 

Yeah, I’m defaulting to “Dune” here again. And I’m also kinda glad they combined the sound categories. It makes it less confusing. What I will say here is that “A Quiet Place: Part II” should’ve been in here, with at least a nomination. I know the Oscars are allergic to both horror films and sequels, but there was still no better use of sound in a film in 2021 than “A Quiet Place: Part II.” It was just as effective as the first movie on that front.

Makeup and Hairstyling:

Nominations: 

- “Coming 2 America” - Mike Marino, Stacey Morris and Carla Farmer
- “Cruella” - Nadia Stacey, Naomi Donne and Julia Vernon
- “Dune” - Donald Mowat, Love Larson and Eva von Bah
- “The Eyes of Tammy Faye” - Linda Dowds, Stephanie Ingram and Justin Raleigh
- “House of Gucci” - Göran Lundström, Anna Carin Lock and Frederic Aspiras 

Will Win:

- “The Eyes of Tammy Faye” - Linda Dowds, Stephanie Ingram and Justin Raleigh 

Should Win:

- “Cruella” - Nadia Stacey, Naomi Donne and Julia Vernon 

By the looks of things, it appears that they’re pairing this category right along with the best actress race. And yeah, half of Jessica Chastain’s performance in that movie was the incredible makeup work they did. More on that later, though. While I will admit that the makeup work in “The Eyes of Tammy Faye” was really good, despite not much of anything else in that movie being worth anything, I still prefer the work in “Cruella.” Sure, costume design is the real strength of “Cruella,” but there was still a lot of excellent makeup and hairstyling going on the movie, especially in regards to Emma Stone’s look. I mean, transforming Emma into Cruella was more than just the dresses. But I’ll have to be content with one win for “Cruella.” Just as long as we keep the Oscar far away from “House of Gucci” I’ll be happy. 

Film Editing: 

Nominations: 

- “Don’t Look Up” - Hank Corwin
- “Dune” - Joe Walker
- “King Richard” - Pamela Martin
- “The Power of the Dog” - Peter Sciberras
- “tick, tick… BOOM!” - Myron Kerstein and Andrew Weisblum 

Will Win: 

- “King Richard” - Pamela Martin 

Should Win:

-  “tick, tick… BOOM!” - Myron Kerstein and Andrew Weisblum 

Another really tough category. Yeah, as I said, it’s easy to default to “Dune” for the technical categories, but I do feel editing often goes to a best picture nominee. So as you can see, it’s not “Dune” vs. “The Power of the Dog” I’m fighting between here. It’s “Power of the Dog” vs. “King Richard” and possibly “tick, tick… BOOM!” At the ACE Eddie Awards (American Cinema Editors), “King Richard” won drama and “tick, tick… BOOM!” won comedy. That makes me think of 2020 when “Ford v. Ferrari” took this one home. You know, the sports sequences. And the Tennis matches in this movie were genuinely incredible and well edited. I almost went with that in my personal picks, but the editing in “tick, tick… BOOM!” was what made the movie. I usually don’t immediately recognize the editing in a movie, but in that one I did, with how they interwove all of the layers of that film into one masterwork of filmmaking. When I saw its nomination, I thought that meant it was also getting picture, but sadly “Nightmare Alley” took its place instead, which made me grumpy. But all is well. Again, if “The Power of the Dog” is having a great night, it might walk away with this one, which is why I’m torn. 

Costume Design: 

Nominations: 

- “Cruella” - Jenny Beavean
- “Cyrano” - Massimo Cantini Parrini and Jacqueline Durran
- “Dune” - Jacqueline West and Robert Morgan
- “Nightmare Alley” - Luis Sequiera
- “West Side Story” - Paul Tazewell 

Will Win: 

- “Cruella” - Jenny Beavean

Should Win:

- “Cruella” - Jenny Beavean 

You know, we could just say that “Cruella” is winning this award and is 100 percent deserving and move onto the next category. And while it is true that it’s the best of the bunch, as I look over these nominees, this is a great category. In my re-watch of “West Side Story” this week, the costume design really won me over. I haven’t seen “Cyrano” yet, but that’s a cool nomination, too, just looking at the trailers. And even though I don’t like “Nightmare Alley,” both the set design and the costume work to deliver an old-fashioned carnival theme were great. And the costume work in “Dune” is perhaps a bit overlooked, too. Sometimes we take for granted all the work that goes in on many levels in making those blockbusters work. It’s a lot more than just visual effects. I think Marvel and DC should be in this category more than they are. 

Cinematography 

Nominations: 

- “Dune” - Greig Fraser
- “Nightmare Alley” - Dan Laustsen
- “The Power of the Dog” - Ari Wegner
- “The Tragedy of Macbeth” - Dbruno Delbeonnel
- “West Side Story” - Janusz Kaminski 

Will Win: 

- “Dune” - Greig Fraser

Should Win:

- “Dune” - Greig Fraser 

Another easy win for “Dune,” I think. Again, a visual and technical masterpiece. Although, again, this is a really solid category. If I had all the time in the world, it would be fun to go back and watch all of these movies focusing specifically on the cinematography. And I feel I would be blown away five times over. “The Power of the Dog” could play spoiler. And if it does, it’s the first female winner in this category, which would be awesome. I almost want it to win because of that, but if I’m being purely objective, I want to judge by the final product, not by who is the one doing the work. And Greig Fraser’s work is truly mindblowing. And I think he’s going to be back here next year, too, as he also did some absolutely incredible work on “The Batman,” which I certainly hope gets showered with nominations next year. 

Production Design: 

Nominations: 

- “Dune” - Production Design: Patrice Vermette; Set Decoration: Zsuzsanna Sipos  
- “Nightmare Alley” - Production Design: Tamara Deverell; Set Decoration: Shane Vieau
- “The Power of the Dog” - Production Design: Grant Major; Set Decoration: Amber Richards
- “The Tragedy of Macbeth” - Production Design: Stefan Dechant; Set Decoration: Nancy Haigh
- “West Side Story” - Production Design: Adam Stockhausen; Set Decoration: Rena DeAngelo 

Will Win: 

- “Dune” - Production Design: Patrice Vermette; Set Decoration: Zsuzsanna Sipos 

Should Win:

- “West Side Story” - Production Design: Adam Stockhausen; Set Decoration: Rena DeAngelo 

Another win for “Dune.” And another well-deserved win for “Dune.” However, I stumped myself when I sat down to think of this. This is another great category. I was close to giving my award to “Nightmare Alley” for the carnival work or “The Power of the Dog” for the western transformation. Then I thought about the great work in “Dune” as well. However, I recently watched both version of “West Side Story” this week and I was absolutely blown away by how Spielberg took the classic movie and vastly improved upon it. I mean, the old movie felt very restricted and limited with its budget. It almost felt like a filmed play. However, Spielberg took the scenery and the settings and made that the star of the show. Just about every musical number was vastly improved in the new movie because of the production design, set decoration, dance choreography, and costume work. Even the cinematography was great. I wouldn’t mind at all if it stole some of these technical awards away from “Dune.” I don’t think that’s happening. But I wouldn’t be upset is all I’m saying. 

Animated Feature Film:

Nominations: 

- “Encanto” - Jared Bush, Byron Howard, Yvett Merino and Clark Spencer (Walt Disney Animation Studios)
- “Flee” - Jonas Poher Rasmussen, Monica Hellström, Singe Byrge Sørensen and Charlotte De La Gournerie
- “Luca” - Enrco Carosa and Andrea Warren (Pixar Animation Studios)
- “The Mitchells vs. the Machines” - Mike Rianda, Phil Lord, Christopher Miller and Kurt Albrecht (Sony Pictures Animation)
- “Raya and the Last Dragon” - Don Hall, Carlos López Estrada, Osnat Shurer and Peter Del Vecho (Walt Disney Animation Studios) 

Will Win: 

- “Encanto” - Jared Bush, Byron Howard, Yvett Merino and Clark Spencer (Walt Disney Animation Studios) 

Should Win:

- “The Mitchells vs. the Machines” - Mike Rianda, Phil Lord, Christopher Miller and Kurt Albrecht (Sony Pictures Animation) 

I’ve actually been hearing rumblings in the last few weeks that we could be in for an upset in this category. “Encanto” at first seems like it was going to run away with this award, especially when the “Encanto” hype was through the roof back in late December and January. But “Encanto” buzz has died down a bit and “The Mitchells vs. the Machines” seems to be gaining traction, especially as Mike Rianda has been doing some real work in pushing this film, all that during the time when the Oscar voting was opened. I’m not going to be brave enough to call the upset, but I’ll be pushing for it. I really enjoyed “Encanto,” but “The Mitchells vs. the Machines” was one my favorite movies overall last year, animated or not. In fact, I had it in my top five. To heck with best animated feature, I think this deserves a best picture nomination, even if there were only five nominees. It’s that good. On par with “Spider-Verse,” a fellow Sony Pictures Animation movie. If you haven’t seen this movie yet, watch it ASAP. 

Writing (Adapted Screenplay): 

Nominations: 

- “CODA” - Siân Heder
- “Drive My Car” - Ryusuke Hamaguchi and Takmesa Oe
- “Dune” - Jon Spaihts, Denis Villeneuve and Eric Roth
- “The Lost Daughter” - Maggie Gyllenhaal
- “The Power of the Dog” - Jane Campion 

Will Win: 

- “CODA” - Siân Heder 

Should Win:

- “The Power of the Dog” – Jane Campion 

I love “CODA.” It’s my favorite of the best picture nominees and my No. 2 film of 2021. But I will admit that it’s not the screenplay that makes it work. It’s kinda a traditional coming of age movie. I think it’s the emotion and the execution of the screenplay that makes it shine. Not what’s on the page that the actors were reading. That said, I do think that the momentum has started to shift in its way and I think it could pull off wins in every category it’s in. Or they could go “Drive My Car” or “The Lost Daughter.” Sometimes they do that with the screenplay category, give it to a movie that’s not winning best picture just to give it something. Or it could go to “The Power of the Dog” if that movie is having a great night. As you can say, in this category that’s what I’ve leaned on, although I got really stumped with this category. Ultimately I think the screenplay in “The Power of the Dog” is one of the movie’s strengths. The plot of that movie is genius, especially with how it’s a movie within a movie that you don’t notice until you’ve finished the movie and need to re-watch. That’s some powerful writing and directing on the part of Jane Campion that makes that work. And I think she deserves both awards. 

Writing (Original Screenplay):

Nominations: 

- “Belfast” - Kenneth Branagh
- “Don’t Look Up” - Adam McKay and David Sirota
- “King Richard” - Zach Baylin
- “Licorice Pizza” - Paul Thomas Anderson
- “The Worst Person in the World” - Eskil Vogt and Joachim Trier 

Will Win: 

- “Belfast” - Kenneth Branagh 

Should Win:

- “The Worst Person in the World” - Eskil Vogt and Joachim Trier 

With “CODA” and “The Power of the Dog” in the OTHER writing category, I think that opens the door for “Belfast” to take this award. And I think it’s a much easier prediction here. I think the Academy likes Kenneth Branagh and they want to reward his film. And this is where they’re going to do it. For my pick, this is quite easily “The Worst Person in the World.” That’s another movie where the plot is what’s genius. With how it started, I thought I knew where it was going, then it threw me for a loop and punched me in the gut with some genius writing work with that screenplay. Easily better than the others. I don’t think “Belfast” or “King Richard” have remarkable screenplays even though the movies are fun. “Don’t Look Up” is a hilarious romp, but doesn’t deserve Oscars. And “Licorice Pizza” is a bit of a train wreck in many areas, stemming from a lot of the writing, not just with the awkward age gap, but also with those racist scenes. PTA wrote those sequences into his screenplay. I know he deserves an Oscar at some point, but not for this. 

Actress in a Supporting Role: 

Nominations: 

- Jessie Buckley - “The Lost Daughter”
- Ariana DeBose - “West Side Story”
- Judi Dench - “Belfast”
- Kirsten Dunst - “The Power of the Dog”
- Aunjanue Ellis - “King Richard” 

Will Win: 

- Ariana DeBose - “West Side Story” 

Should Win:

- Aunjanue Ellis - “King Richard” 

Three of the four acting categories are actually pretty cut and dry. We could see some surprises on Oscar night, but I don’t think we’ll see those surprises in the acting realm, with best actress being the exception. But we’ll get that. As far as supporting actress, it’s set in stone. And it was decided months ago, I think. Ariana DeBose is winning an Oscar for the same role that Rita Morena won it for 50 years ago. And Ariana might even have a better performance under her belt than Morena, which is some high praise from me. And thus might surprise you to see me not pick her. I know, it’s tough. But Aunjanue Ellis is the heart and soul of “King Richard.” It’s her that carries the movie. Not Will Smith. I have no problem giving Will an Oscar. He did a great job at portraying the rather arrogant and dominate personality of Richard Williams, but Aunjanue as his wife Brandy is the only character that could knock some sense into him and in several sequences I had my jaw on the floor after her scenes. And hearing from Venus and Serena themselves in interviews and awards speeches say how perfectly she portrayed their mother really put it over the edge for me. Will’s Oscar is a lifetime achievement. Aunjanue gives the best performance of the movie. 

Actor in a Supporting Role: 

Nominations:

- Ciarán Hinds - “Belfast”
- Troy Kotsur - “CODA”
- Jesse Plemons - “The Power of the Dog”
- J.K. Simmons - “Being the Ricardos”
- Kodi Smit-McPhee - “The Power of the Dog” 

Will Win:

 - Troy Kotsur - “CODA”

Should Win:

- Troy Kotsur - “CODA” 

It has made me very happy in the last month or so that Troy Kotsur has become the runaway favorite in this category. It started as Ciarán Hinds as the predicted favorite, then shifted towards Kodi Smit-McPhee around nomination time. But then Troy Kotsur started winning things. And then he started winning literally everything. Sure, Hinds and Smit-McPhee aren’t necessarily out of it, but I think Smit-McPhee and Plemons might be splitting the vote among the fans of “The Power of the Dog” and “Belfast” has seemingly fallen out of favor in the awards race. If it was winning best picture, Hinds would follow it. But this is Troy Kotsur’s to lose and I’m incredibly happy. I do think Hinds would be an excellent win. The best part of “Belfast” for me. But Simmons has already won an Oscar. Plemons and Smit-McPhee have long careers ahead of them. But with Troy Kotsur, him as a deaf actor playing in a movie about a deaf family and their hearing daughter is a once in a lifetime opportunity when it comes to awards. I don’t know how many other roles perfectly fitted towards him that he’s going to get in movies about deaf people that are getting heavily praised. Add that to the fact that he’s the best part of the movie and the fact that I believe he’s the best of the five and this would be the no-brainer pick for me even if he wasn’t the heavy favorite. 

Actress in a Leading Role: 

Nominations: 

- Jessica Chastain - “The Eyes of Tammy Faye”
- Olivia Colman - “The Lost Daughter”
- Penélope Cruz - “Parallel Mothers”
- Nicole Kidman - “Being the Ricardos”
- Kristen Stewart - “Spencer” 

Will Win: 

- Jessica Chastain - “The Eyes of Tammy Faye” 

Should Win:

- Kristen Stewart - “Spencer” 

And this is the most bonkers award of the season. Oftentimes you look at the precursors to see what’s going to happen. And in the case of the other categories, the precursors are what’s making me feel confident in my predictions. But in this case, the precursors have been all over the place. No one is in any real agreement as to who is deserving of a win. There was even some heavy misses. The BAFTAs, for example, had no nominees in common with the Oscars. When those nominations came out, people thought Gaga was the new front-runner, but she didn’t even get a nomination from the Oscars. Then if we back up, Kristen Stewart initially seemed like the favorite. Until she started missing and barely got in. Nicole Kidman became the front-runner. Then it was Gaga for a second, like mentioned. Then people thought maybe Olivia Colman might be getting her second Oscar win. I’ve even heard people think that Penélope Cruz could be a spoiler, even though she wasn’t nominated in anything else. Recently it seems like Jessica Chastain has risen above the rest, winning at SAG and Critic Choice. So that’s what I’m going with, but really any of the five could win and I wouldn’t be surprised. 

That said, with who I want to win, I actually think Jodie Comer from “The Last Duel” gave the best lead actress performance of the year. But for some reason that movie got no love at awards season, despite having great reviews and being released at the proper time. Now I wouldn’t be upset at a Chastain win. She’s also one of my favorite actresses and is far overdue for an Oscar. But yeah, with these nominees it’s not even close. I am 1,000 percent on the Kristen Stewart train. Her performance as Princess Diana was perfect in every way. And this should be her third or fourth Oscar nomination, not just her first. So I’ve been pushing her for years and am glad to see her finally getting it. If she wins, that will be the award that I would be happiest about, but all of these ladies are deserving, so I’m not going to be mad. 

Actor in a Leading Role: 

Nominations: 

- Javier Bardem - “Being the Ricardos”
- Benedict Cumberbatch - “The Power of the Dog”
- Andrew Garfield - “tick, tick… BOOM!”
- Will Smith - “King Richard”
- Denzel Washington - “The Tragedy of Macbeth” 

Will Win: 

- Will Smith - “King Richard” 

Should Win:

- Andrew Garfield - “tick, tick… BOOM!” 

This category is a lot less complex, so only one paragraph. Every year there’s at least one actor or actress that everyone seems to unanimously decide to coronate. And there’s been absolutely no disagreements when it comes to this award. Will Smith was the favorite at the beginning of the season. And he got nominated everywhere. And has won every award. At least when it comes to the major precursors that mean anything. And I’m totally fine with it. Will Smith is one of the world’s best and favorite actors. And has been since the 90s. He deserves his trophy. And he gave a solid enough performance for me to not be mad. And all his speeches have been excellent, which I think has strengthened his case. But as I said earlier, Aunjanue Ellis was my favorite part of that movie. My choice for this category is also not nominated. I think Nicolas Cage from “Pig” gave the best lead acting performance. But as he’s not on here, I’m on team Garfield. For this performance alone he deserves it. “tick, tick… BOOM!” was in my top 10 of 2021 and it was because of Garfield. That and the whole Spider-Man thing makes him deserving. He deserves an Oscar for that campaign alone. The way he convincingly lied to everyone was great, despite being constantly pestered about being in the movie. 

Directing: 

Nominations: 

- Kenneth Branagh - “Belfast”
- Ryusuke Hamaguchi - “Drive My Car”
- Paul Thomas Anderson - “Licorice Pizza”
- Jane Campion - “The Power of the Dog”
- Steven Spielberg - “West Side Story” 

Will Win: 

- Jane Campion - “The Power of the Dog” 

Should Win:

- Jane Campion - “The Power of the Dog” 

The movie that’s winning best picture has been a heavy debate. The movie that is winning best director is not. This used to be a category that would go to the best picture winner every year, but recently that’s split fairly often. Given that CODA isn’t in here, Jane Campion is running away with this, with Kenneth Branagh a very distant second place. The only knock on her is that she said something really stupid when she accepted her Critics Choice award and that was right before the Oscar voting started, or possibly during. But I don’t think that will hurt her enough that she loses when there really isn’t much competition. Maybe if Siân Heder, we could debate. But she’s not. And I do think Campion is deserving here. As I said in the screenplay section, the way that “The Power of the Dog” was a movie within a movie made for a very complex film that worked because of some great writing and even better directing. She had to fool people on the first watch, then blow their minds on a second watch. And she had to direct everything and everyone perfectly in order to make it work in the way that it did. 

Best Picture:

Nominations: 

- “Belfast” - Laura Berwick, Kenneth Branagh, Becca Kovacik and Tamar Thomas, Producers (Focus Features)
- “CODA” - Philippe Rousselet, Fabrice Gianfermi and Patrick Wachsberger, Producers (Apple TV+)
- “Don’t Look Up” - Adam McKay and Kevin Messick, Producers (Netflix)
- “Drive My Car” - Teruhisa Yamamoto, Producer (Bitter End)
- “Dune” - Mary Parent, Denis Villeneuve and Cale Boyter, Producers (Warner Bros.)
- “King Richard” - Tim White, Trevor White and Will Smith, Producers (Warner Bros.)
- “Licorice Pizza” - Sara Murphy, Adam Somner and Paul Thomas Anderson, Producers (United Artists)
- “Nightmare Alley” - Guillermo del Toro, J. Miles Dale and Bradley Cooper, Producers (Searchlight Pictures)
- “The Power of the Dog” - Jane Campion, Tanya Seghatchian, Emile Sherman, Iain Canning and Roger Frappier, Producers (Netflix)
- “West Side Story” - Steven Spielberg and Kristie Macosko Krieger, Producers (20th Century Studios)

Will Win:

- “CODA” - Philippe Rousselet, Fabrice Gianfermi and Patrick Wachsberger, Producers (Apple TV+ 

Should Win:

- “CODA” - Philippe Rousselet, Fabrice Gianfermi and Patrick Wachsberger, Producers (Apple TV+)

Very daring of me to predict my favorite of the nominees to win best picture. I’m setting myself up for failure. And I almost predicted “The Power of the Dog” just because of that. But do you know what? Screw you, curse. My favorite movie has never won best picture in the time of me following the Oscars. And that curse continues because I declared “The Father” as my favorite movie of 2021. But as “The Father” was eligible for last year’s ceremony, despite being a 2021 release, it obviously wasn’t here, so the curse doesn’t apply. Or it already continued with both “Promising Young Woman” and “The Father” both losing to “Nomadland” last year. My No. 2 film of the year HAS won a few times before, with “12 Years a Slave,” “Birdman,” and “Spotlight” as examples. So CODA being my No. 2 film is positive thing, right?

That ridiculousness aside, this is really a tough choice. I started typing this post with the idea that I would be predicting “The Power of the Dog,” simply because it got 12 nominees and has been the front-runner for most of the season. But “CODA” now has the momentum and is actually kinda the front-runner right now. It’s had several big wins in the last few weeks that has put it ahead. And one of the things that trips me up every year is the ranked choice voting that the Oscars do for best picture. Without spending too long on that, it’s not the movie that people love the most that wins. It’s the movie that’s hated the least. You have to get 50 percent of the votes. And if that doesn’t happen, they eliminate the last place vote getter and give those votes to whatever was next on those ballots. So the initial vote of most No. 1s isn’t as important as what movie has the most number of 2s and 3s on people’s ballots. CODA is a lot less of a divisive film than “The Power of the Dog.” And in a moment in time where the world around us is crazy, people might want to have a feel-good drama win best picture rather than a darker revenge thriller.

If “The Power of the Dog” wins, that means it probably won on the first round or two of voting. The further we get into the ensuing rounds, the better the chance that “CODA” has. We’ll never know how that turned out, but you can guess what happened after we hear the result. Also, if “The Power of the Dog” wins best picture, I also think it’s taking home a lot of the other categories. I can’t see it winning just picture and director. And when I went through each category, my gut said to go somewhere else with my pick. And so we get to best picture and I felt I had to go “CODA.” If “CODA” loses, then I’m fine with that. Ever since it became front-runner, there’s been a heavy wave of hate that has hit it, which is ridiculous. So maybe it’s not good for it to win best picture? Anyways, we’ll see here really soon.

Wednesday, March 23, 2022

West Side Story Review (1961 & 2021) (SPOILERS)

The Oscars are this weekend and I definitely have my major Oscars post coming soon, but before we do that I need to get my thoughts out on one of the nominees for best picture, that of “West Side Story.” This is a movie that I saw and enjoyed in theaters back in December, but I left with questions. Questions that revolved around me not having done my homework before going into the movie, meaning I had not seen the original 1961 movie that this was a remake of. A rather egregious oversight for someone like myself, but such is life sometimes. I have now rectified that wrong, spending a lot more time than I was planning on both movies, in order to nail down these thoughts in my brain.

Word of caution. This might come with some unpopular takes. Also word of caution. I will dive into spoilers for a 50-year-old movie, if you’re weird like me and haven’t seen it. Naturally there will also be spoilers for the three-month-old remake, which is slightly more of a serious warning. But for most people, there’s not a whole lot to spoil, all things considered. Just got to cover my bases here. And yeah, this is a double review with my thoughts on both movies intertwined together because that’s key to my overall thoughts. 

First off, I want to focus on the good behind both movies. Because this is a classic production for a reason. From a certain and understandable point of view, one might say that the most important part of a musical is the musical of it all. And there are few musicals out there that are more classic and more iconic than “West Side Story.” To the point where one like me watching for the first time at the end of last year might perk up and say, “Wait a minute, I know all of this music!” I think it speaks volumes about a musical that it is so ingrained in the culture that I knew the music very well without having seen the actual movie. Usually it takes me a bit to soak in a new musical and truly appreciate the songs in it. But in this case, I knew and loved the music already. It certainly didn’t feel like I was watching something for the first time. 

And certainly the credit for this goes to Stephen Sondheim and Leonard Bernstein, who wrote the lyrics and music to the 1957 Broadway musical that debuted four years before the movie was released. I’m not a huge musical buff, but even I’m well aware Stephen Sondheim and it’s incredibly impressive when I look at all of his work and see how much of a master at his craft he was. His list of iconic music that he wrote for so many musicals is very long and very impressive. Every musical number in “West Side Story” is very good. The songs are very catchy. There’s a good variety to them. Their flow and placement in the production is well balanced. And to the movie’s credit, the original movie was very well cast in terms of getting talent on board who could sing these numbers in an impressive way, whether it be the actors themselves or vocal doubles who did the singing parts, which is certainly something I would be in favor of going back to. If you must have a certain actor playing the part, I would rather cast someone else to do the singing rather than trying to teach the non-singer how to sing. 

And to go along with the impressive singing in the movie, the dance choreography is very impressive. Every number is both entertaining and awe-inspiring.

“But Adam, are you talking about the 1961 movie or the 2021 movie when you are praising the music and dance?”

Yes. Both. Because both movies do an incredible job at this. However, if we’re comparing the two, one thing that I was especially impressed with when I went back and watched both movies is that this new movie takes what the original provided and improved on it. And that was one of the questions that I had after initially watching the new movie in theaters that was answered in a very positive way when I went back to do my homework on this. I was sufficiently thrilled and entertained by it all, but was it a necessary remake? And yeah, it was. The dance and choreography in Spielberg’s remake was a whole lot more breathtaking. The original was still very well done, but the sets felt more restricted. It had the feel of a stage production that was filmed, making it slightly less cinematic. And maybe that’s due to the restrictions of its time. But Spielberg definitely took advantage of the modern technology to make his version feel grand and epic. He makes use of the entire city rather than having a group of people dancing on a stage. And that’s what should happen in movie musicals. If I’m watching a stage production, I can suspend disbelief a bit. But if I’m watching a movie, it shouldn’t feel like I’m watching a stage production, if that makes sense. If you have the technology and ability to make your movie feel cinematic, take advantage of that.

Also to Spielberg’s credit, his movie is much improved when it comes to actual representation. Now back in 1961, perhaps there were different standards and different expectations, but very few people in that movie are actually Puerto Rican. Some are. But most are Americans playing Puerto Ricans, including our lead actress Natalie Wood, who plays Maria. And even among those few that are Puerto Rican, there’s a bit of a cringey practice they used that we call “brownfacing.” Rita Moreno, who plays Anita in the film, talked about how they put makeup on her to make her appear more brown so that she “looks” Puerto Rican. And she was one of the few who was actually Puerto Rican, so it was extremely unnecessary.

Again, maybe back in 1961 that wasn’t an issue in people’s minds. But definitely looking back in hindsight, that’s a major problem. And so it’s very nice to see new movie be authentic by casting actors who either are Puerto Rican, are of Puerto Rican descent, or at the very least are Latino. Wikipedia tells me that Rachel Zegler, who plays Maria, is of Colombian descent. Which is certainly better than Natalie Wood, an American born to Russian immigrant parents. Representation matters and the new movie deserves credit for proper representation. It even caters to the Spanish audience with some Spanish dialogue mixed in… without subtitles translating into English. We even turned on subtitles when I was watching with friends last night and when they were speaking Spanish, it said “(Speaking Spanish)” instead of telling us what they were saying. And I applauded that. I can infer based on context what was being said while appreciating the fact that the movie was geared to Puerto Ricans in more ways than one.

So yeah, with all of this said, I can genuinely say that Steven Spielberg took a classic, beloved film, one that was a winner of 10 Oscars, including best picture, and made a better version of it with quality representation, music that matches the quality of the original, and dance numbers that are more impressive and more cinematic.

The issues here comes with plot. And this is where sometimes hardcore musical fans sometimes get really upset at my analysis. It seems to me that many of them can be perfectly satisfied with excellent music and dance without caring too much about what’s happening with the plot. I care about both. And there are plenty of examples, even from movie musicals last year like “tick, tick… BOOM!” and “In the Heights,” that had a wonderful combination of great music and great plot. “West Side Story” falls quite a bit short on the plot category of things.

Specifically the issue comes with the lead romance. It’s bad. In both movies. I watched the new movie in December and loved most of it, but was concerned with the fact that there was absolutely no chemistry between Ansel Elgort and Rachel Zegler. None. Zero. Zip. Nada. One of the worst on screen romances that I can remember. And it’s unfortunate because I love both of them individually. At least in regards to their acting performances. Both do their character justice and both of them can sing. But they just aren’t a very interesting couple and it makes the drama that happens between them really rocky and borderline cringey.

I thought maybe that this was a new movie problem. Maybe they got everything right in the new movie, but just happened to cast two leads that didn’t work together very well. And maybe that would be a ding on this one compared to the original. But nope. In the original movie, the lead couple of Tony and Maria are as equally uninteresting. Maybe they have a tad bit more chemistry, but not by a lot.

Now I know the opposing point of view to this. And it’s a valid argument. This story is a direct adaptation of “Romeo and Juliet,” a story that is centered around a doomed and rushed teen romance. One could say that story is tragic BECAUSE the romance isn’t great. Two kids from opposite factions of a war or a dispute falling in love in reckless fashion that’s more of a doomed infatuation rather than an honest love and built-up romance. And the forbidden love of it all makes them more reckless because no one wants them to fall in love, but they don’t care and start actively rebelling against their families’ wishes. Perhaps the real morals and themes behind it is not about the love and romance at all, but is more of a look on racism and the perhaps frustrating nature of people hating each other for no good reason and how that unjustified hatred and anger can lead to very unfortunate consequences that neither side intended.

To that point, “West Side Story” does a very good job of a painting a very dreary picture of how warring factions can destroy a happy society. There’s no reason for the Americans and the Puerto Ricans to hate each other so much, but the reckless nature of the gang violence leads heartbreak, death and murder. And again, to the new movie’s credit, Spielberg does a really good job of diving even deeper into characters like Tony and Riff, giving them extra depth and background that makes the movie’s finale even that much more tragic.

But still, I have a really hard time overlooking the fact that the romance is very cheesy and ridiculous. While I had not seen “West Side Story,” I am quite familiar with “Romeo and Juliet” and it’s made adaptations and various movies that are influenced by it. And I’ve seen many movies that follow the exact outline, yet still accomplish the themes of the story while portraying a romantic arc that is believable. My two quick examples out of many are “Titanic” and “Warm Bodies.” Both are inspired by “Romeo and Juliet.” “Warm Bodies” is even a direct parody of it. In “Titanic,” Jack and Rose have immediate chemistry and are a couple that I root for the whole movie. In “Warm Bodies,” even though it’s silly and comedic, there’s still a connection between R and Julie (note the unashamed parody, even in the names?). In the new “West Side Story,” Tony and Marie are making out behind the bleachers within seconds of meeting each other and are both talking about marriage the next day. And if I thought that was cheesy enough, the old movie is a whole lot worse with how they meet. Still at the dance, but I laughed out loud when they connected eyes and the whole room moved aside so that they could embrace and start kissing.

In the new movie, the next day Tony is asking Valentina, Rita Moreno’s character in the new film, how to say certain phrases in Spanish and she starts questioning him as to why he’s rushing into it. “Don’t you want to ask her out to coffee first?” And yes, everyone watching is on her side with how silly this whole thing is. And to fast forward to the end of the movie, Tony kills Maria’s brother, then immediately goes to Maria and that’s the moment they first make love in the movie. Seconds after he breaks the news to her that he just killed her brother. I don’t care who you are or what world you’re in, there is no situation where I believe it is the least bit realistic for you to immediately sleep with the guy seconds after learning he just killed your brother, especially when it’s a guy you just barely met for the first time 24 hours previously.

And such nonsense in both movies makes the tragedy of it all less impactful. If there was some way to fix the lead romance to make it seem realistic, then the ending of the two gangs just not being able to mend their hatred would really hit home and you would leave with heavy emotions after the deaths of Riff, Bernard, and Tony. But the cheesiness of it all makes the final act of the movie crash and burn in a way that’s more recklessly written than the rushed romance itself.

I don’t know exactly what Spielberg could’ve done to fix this in his movie, but he took a very flawed story and recreated the same issues. He made the movie more cinematic. He made the musical numbers more grand and epic. He gave Puerto Ricans some real representation. And all of that deserves to be applauded. But what he also did is take a badly written romance story and made it even worse. Maybe how it was initially written works for a 1961 movie. There’s a lot of old-fashioned, classic films where characters go from strangers to madly in love in record time, many of which skip the whole courting process altogether. And it was fine for its time. But if that was the acceptable thing in old movies, then doing a cut and paste for 2021 might not be the best idea. I think even small things like stretching the plot out for a few weeks or a month could’ve gone a long way into making it more believable. Like I’ve pointed out, “Romeo and Juliet” HAS been done in ways that make it more believable while still keeping the tragedy and the core of the story and themes in place. “West Side Story” is just not one of those adaptations where the romance works for me and I do think it cuts into the impact of the resolution.

And that is why I leave feeling a bit conflicted about the whole thing. If I focus just on the music and the dance, then the original film is incredible and classic. And it’s even more impressive that Spielberg made the better version of that. But what am I supposed to do when other elements of both movies are so bad that it’s entertaining to make fun of them with a group of people? “So bad it’s good” is not the label that belongs anywhere near an iconic musical, which is why I can’t give either a full pass.

As I said, in terms of movie musicals from 2021, both “tick, tick… BOOM!” and “In the Heights” are superior films than “West Side Story,” even if “West Side Story” has the edge on both when it comes to the actual music. Make of that what you will.